Flank steak vs. Sugar substitute — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
What are the differences between flank steak and sugar substitute?
- Flank steak is higher in zinc, vitamin B6, phosphorus, iron, vitamin B5, vitamin B2, potassium, and copper; however, sugar substitute is richer in calcium.
- Sugar substitute's daily need coverage for calcium is 86% more.
- Sugar substitute contains 123 times less zinc than flank steak. Flank steak contains 4.9mg of zinc, while sugar substitute contains 0.04mg.
- Flank steak has less sodium.
- Flank steak has a lower glycemic index (0) than sugar substitute (40).
We used Beef, flank, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled and Sweeteners, sugar substitute, granulated, brown types in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +283.3% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +769.2% |
| Contains more IronIron | +987.5% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +1071.4% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +12150% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +2525% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -90.2% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +∞% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +4295% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +144.4% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +400% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +786.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +581.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +3760% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +∞% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
27.66 g
Fats:
8.23 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
64.17 g
Other:
0 g
Protein:
2.06 g
Fats:
0 g
Carbs:
84.77 g
Water:
9.14 g
Other:
4.03 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +1242.7% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +∞% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +602.1% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
~equal in
Other
~4.03g
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Calcium | 20mg | 879mg | 86% |
| Vitamin B12 | 1.63µg | 68% | |
| Selenium | 29.4µg | 53% | |
| Protein | 27.66g | 2.06g | 51% |
| Vitamin B3 | 7.363mg | 46% | |
| Zinc | 4.9mg | 0.04mg | 44% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.579mg | 0.015mg | 43% |
| Phosphorus | 210mg | 8mg | 29% |
| Carbs | 0g | 84.77g | 28% |
| Cholesterol | 79mg | 26% | |
| Sodium | 56mg | 572mg | 22% |
| Iron | 1.74mg | 0.16mg | 20% |
| Choline | 105.4mg | 19% | |
| Saturated fat | 3.395g | 15% | |
| Fats | 8.23g | 0g | 13% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.133mg | 0.015mg | 9% |
| Potassium | 339mg | 39mg | 9% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.545mg | 0.08mg | 9% |
| Copper | 0.082mg | 0.007mg | 8% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 3.317g | 8% | |
| Calories | 192kcal | 347kcal | 8% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.075mg | 0.015mg | 5% |
| Magnesium | 23mg | 6mg | 4% |
| Vitamin E | 0.38mg | 3% | |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.322g | 2% | |
| Folate | 9µg | 2% | |
| Fiber | 0g | 0.6g | 2% |
| Manganese | 0.009mg | 0.022mg | 1% |
| Vitamin K | 1.4µg | 1% | |
| Starch | 3.52g | 1% | |
| Net carbs | 0g | 84.17g | N/A |
| Sugar | 0g | 4.03g | N/A |
| Tryptophan | 0.182mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 1.105mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 1.259mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 2.201mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 2.338mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.72mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 1.093mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 1.372mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.883mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
49%
1%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
54%
36%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Sugar substitute is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 79mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Sugar substitute is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 3.395g)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Flank steak is lower in Sugar (difference - 4.03g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Flank steak contains less Sodium (difference - 516mg)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Flank steak is lower in glycemic index (difference - 40)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Flank steak is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Flank steak is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)