Ginger ale vs. Bisque — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
The main differences between ginger ale and bisque
- Bisque is richer than ginger ale in vitamin A.
- Daily need coverage for sodium for bisque is 18% higher.
- Ginger ale contains less sodium.
Food types used in this article are Beverages, carbonated, ginger ale and Soup, tomato bisque, canned, prepared with equal volume water.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -98.3% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +∞% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +300% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +433.3% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +16800% |
| Contains more IronIron | +83.3% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +188.9% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +380% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +∞% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +700% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
0 g
Fats:
0 g
Carbs:
8.76 g
Water:
91.23 g
Other:
0.01 g
Protein:
0.92 g
Fats:
1.02 g
Carbs:
9.6 g
Water:
87.17 g
Other:
1.29 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +∞% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +∞% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +12800% |
~equal in
Carbs
~9.6g
~equal in
Water
~87.17g
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Sodium | 7mg | 424mg | 18% |
| Fructose | 3.7g | 5% | |
| Potassium | 1mg | 169mg | 5% |
| Copper | 0.018mg | 0.052mg | 4% |
| Manganese | 0.013mg | 0.104mg | 4% |
| Vitamin C | 0mg | 2.4mg | 3% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0g | 0.45g | 3% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0mg | 0.036mg | 3% |
| Phosphorus | 0mg | 24mg | 3% |
| Vitamin B3 | 0mg | 0.465mg | 3% |
| Protein | 0g | 0.92g | 2% |
| Vitamin A | 0µg | 18µg | 2% |
| Zinc | 0.05mg | 0.24mg | 2% |
| Iron | 0.18mg | 0.33mg | 2% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0mg | 0.029mg | 2% |
| Folate | 0µg | 6µg | 2% |
| Fats | 0g | 1.02g | 2% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0mg | 0.027mg | 2% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0mg | 0.05mg | 1% |
| Saturated fat | 0g | 0.22g | 1% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0g | 0.28g | 1% |
| Calories | 34kcal | 50kcal | 1% |
| Fiber | 0g | 0.2g | 1% |
| Calcium | 3mg | 16mg | 1% |
| Magnesium | 1mg | 4mg | 1% |
| Cholesterol | 0mg | 2mg | 1% |
| Carbs | 8.76g | 9.6g | 0% |
| Net carbs | 8.76g | 9.4g | N/A |
| Sugar | 8.9g | N/A | |
| Selenium | 0.1µg | 0% | |
| Tryptophan | 0.009mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.027mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 0.031mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 0.051mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 0.036mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.012mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.031mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 0.035mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.018mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
0%
4%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
2%
14%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Ginger ale is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 2mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Ginger ale contains less Sodium (difference - 417mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Ginger ale is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 0.22g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Ginger ale is lower in glycemic index (difference - 7)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Bisque is lower in Sugar (difference - 8.9g)
Which food is cheaper?
Bisque is cheaper (difference - $0.6)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Bisque is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Bisque is relatively richer in vitamins