Hamburger vs. Kielbasa — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
The main differences between hamburgers and kielbasa
- Hamburgers have more iron; however, kielbasa has more vitamin C, monounsaturated fat, and polyunsaturated fat.
- Daily need coverage for sodium for kielbasa is 34% higher.
- Kielbasa is lower in sugar.
- Hamburgers have a higher glycemic index than kielbasa.
Food types used in this article are Fast foods, hamburger; double, regular, patty; plain and Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +∞% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +∞% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +∞% |
| Contains more IronIron | +132.3% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +∞% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +∞% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +∞% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -65.5% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +∞% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +30.4% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +517.9% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +22.6% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +45.3% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +89.9% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -18.2% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +50.5% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +513.2% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin B12 | 1.44µg | 60% | |
| Vitamin B3 | 5.365mg | 34% | |
| Sodium | 414mg | 1200mg | 34% |
| Zinc | 2.87mg | 26% | |
| Iron | 2.88mg | 1.24mg | 21% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.25mg | 19% | |
| Phosphorus | 136mg | 19% | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.217mg | 18% | |
| Vitamin C | 0mg | 14.8mg | 16% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.203mg | 16% | |
| Folate | 56µg | 14% | |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.38g | 2.33g | 13% |
| Copper | 0.091mg | 10% | |
| Calcium | 102mg | 10% | |
| Manganese | 0.217mg | 9% | |
| Cholesterol | 47mg | 70mg | 8% |
| Protein | 17.08g | 13.1g | 8% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 5.495g | 8.27g | 7% |
| Potassium | 226mg | 7% | |
| Carbs | 24.1g | 3.9g | 7% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.31mg | 6% | |
| Saturated fat | 5.096g | 6.23g | 5% |
| Magnesium | 20mg | 5% | |
| Fats | 14.36g | 17.6g | 5% |
| Fiber | 0.9g | 0g | 4% |
| Calories | 295kcal | 226kcal | 3% |
| Fructose | 2.03g | 3% | |
| Net carbs | 23.2g | 3.9g | N/A |
| Sugar | 4.15g | 0g | N/A |
| Trans fat | 0.814g | N/A | |
| Tryptophan | 0.206mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.666mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 0.716mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 1.319mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 1.226mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.37mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.677mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 0.823mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.505mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
38%
4%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
42%
20%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Kielbasa is lower in Sugar (difference - 4.15g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Kielbasa is lower in glycemic index (difference - 38)
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Hamburger is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 23mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Hamburger contains less Sodium (difference - 786mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Hamburger is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 1.134g)
Which food is cheaper?
Hamburger is cheaper (difference - $1.5)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Hamburger is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Hamburger is relatively richer in vitamins