Kielbasa vs. Coleslaw — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Differences between kielbasa and coleslaw
- Kielbasa has more iron and monounsaturated fat, while coleslaw has more fiber and polyunsaturated fat.
- Kielbasa's daily need coverage for sodium is 43% higher.
- Coleslaw contains 18 times less cholesterol than kielbasa. Kielbasa contains 70mg of cholesterol, while coleslaw contains 4mg.
- Kielbasa has a lower glycemic index. The glycemic index of kielbasa is 28, while the glycemic index of coleslaw is 39.
The food types used in this comparison are Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked and Fast foods, coleslaw.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more IronIron | +463.6% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -83.1% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +1278.9% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +77.6% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +309.6% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +281.8% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +18.4% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +209.6% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -74.3% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +129.5% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin K | 70.9µg | 59% | |
| Sodium | 1200mg | 203mg | 43% |
| Protein | 13.1g | 0.95g | 24% |
| Cholesterol | 70mg | 4mg | 22% |
| Saturated fat | 6.23g | 1.599g | 21% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 2.33g | 5.348g | 20% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 8.27g | 2.671g | 14% |
| Iron | 1.24mg | 0.22mg | 13% |
| Fats | 17.6g | 9.91g | 12% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.112mg | 9% | |
| Fiber | 0g | 1.9g | 8% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.246mg | 5% | |
| Potassium | 129mg | 4% | |
| Carbs | 3.9g | 14.89g | 4% |
| Vitamin E | 0.54mg | 4% | |
| Manganese | 0.102mg | 4% | |
| Calories | 226kcal | 153kcal | 4% |
| Calcium | 30mg | 3% | |
| Phosphorus | 20mg | 3% | |
| Vitamin A | 0µg | 28µg | 3% |
| Fructose | 1.44g | 2% | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.026mg | 2% | |
| Magnesium | 8mg | 2% | |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.02mg | 2% | |
| Copper | 0.015mg | 2% | |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.206mg | 1% | |
| Zinc | 0.14mg | 1% | |
| Vitamin C | 14.8mg | 14.6mg | 0% |
| Net carbs | 3.9g | 12.99g | N/A |
| Sugar | 0g | 12.19g | N/A |
| Vitamin B12 | 0.01µg | 0% | |
| Trans fat | 0.037g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - EPA | 0.006g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - DHA | 0.001g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - ALA | 0.279g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - Eicosatrienoic acid | 0.001g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Gamma-linoleic acid | 0.024g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Dihomo-gamma-linoleic acid | 0.006g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid | 0.002g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Linoleic acid | 4.979g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
4%
23%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
20%
9%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Kielbasa is lower in Sugar (difference - 12.19g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Kielbasa is lower in glycemic index (difference - 11)
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Coleslaw is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 66mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Coleslaw contains less Sodium (difference - 997mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Coleslaw is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 4.631g)
Which food is cheaper?
Coleslaw is cheaper (difference - $1.5)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Coleslaw is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Coleslaw is relatively richer in vitamins