Kielbasa vs. Drinking water — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison

Compare

A recap on differences between kielbasa and drinking water

Drinking water has less vitamin C, iron, polyunsaturated fat, and monounsaturated fat.
Kielbasa covers your daily sodium needs 52% more than drinking water.
The glycemic index of kielbasa is higher.

Food varieties used in this article are Kielbasa, Polish, turkey, and beef, smoked and Beverages, water, tap, drinking.

Infographic

Infographic link

Mineral Comparison

Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.

Kielbasa

Drinking water

Contains more IronIron

+∞%

Contains less SodiumSodium

-99.7%

~equal in Potassium ~0mg

~equal in Phosphorus ~0mg

~equal in Manganese ~0mg

~equal in Selenium ~0µg

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.

Kielbasa

Drinking water

Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C

+∞%

~equal in Vitamin A ~0µg

~equal in Vitamin E ~0mg

~equal in Vitamin D ~0µg

~equal in Vitamin B1 ~0mg

~equal in Vitamin B2 ~0mg

~equal in Vitamin B3 ~0mg

~equal in Vitamin B5 ~0mg

~equal in Vitamin B6 ~0mg

~equal in Vitamin B12 ~0µg

~equal in Vitamin K ~0µg

~equal in Folate ~0µg

~equal in Choline ~0mg

All nutrients comparison - raw data values

Nutrient			DV% diff.
Sodium	1200mg	4mg	52%
Saturated fat	6.23g	0g	28%
Fats	17.6g	0g	27%
Protein	13.1g	0g	26%
Cholesterol	70mg	0mg	23%
Monounsaturated fat	8.27g	0g	21%
Vitamin C	14.8mg	0mg	16%
Iron	1.24mg	0mg	16%
Polyunsaturated fat	2.33g	0g	16%
Calories	226kcal	0kcal	11%
Carbs	3.9g	0g	1%
Copper		0.01mg	1%
Net carbs	3.9g	0g	N/A
Magnesium		1mg	0%
Calcium		3mg	0%
Zinc		0.01mg	0%