Kielbasa vs. Tea — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Differences between kielbasa and tea
- Tea contains less vitamin C, iron, monounsaturated fat, and polyunsaturated fat than kielbasa.
- Kielbasa's daily need coverage for sodium is 52% higher.
- Tea has a lower glycemic index. The glycemic index of tea is 0, while the glycemic index of kielbasa is 28.
The food types used in this comparison are Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked and Beverages, tea, instant, unsweetened, prepared with water.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more IronIron | +12300% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -99.7% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +21733.3% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +∞% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +2194.1% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +2166.7% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +60.7% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Sodium | 1200mg | 4mg | 52% |
| Saturated fat | 6.23g | 0g | 28% |
| Fats | 17.6g | 0g | 27% |
| Protein | 13.1g | 0.06g | 26% |
| Cholesterol | 70mg | 0mg | 23% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 8.27g | 0g | 21% |
| Manganese | 0.392mg | 17% | |
| Vitamin C | 14.8mg | 0mg | 16% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 2.33g | 0g | 16% |
| Iron | 1.24mg | 0.01mg | 15% |
| Calories | 226kcal | 1kcal | 11% |
| Caffeine | 0mg | 11mg | 3% |
| Copper | 0.011mg | 1% | |
| Potassium | 18mg | 1% | |
| Carbs | 3.9g | 0.17g | 1% |
| Net carbs | 3.9g | 0.17g | N/A |
| Magnesium | 2mg | 0% | |
| Calcium | 3mg | 0% | |
| Sugar | 0g | 0.02g | N/A |
| Zinc | 0.01mg | 0% | |
| Phosphorus | 1mg | 0% | |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.003mg | 0% | |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.032mg | 0% | |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.013mg | 0% | |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.001mg | 0% | |
| Choline | 0.3mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
4%
0%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
20%
6%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Tea is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 70mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Tea contains less Sodium (difference - 1196mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Tea is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 6.23g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Tea is lower in glycemic index (difference - 28)
Which food is cheaper?
Tea is cheaper (difference - $1.3)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Tea is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Tea is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Kielbasa is lower in Sugar (difference - 0.02g)