Foodstruct Nutrition Search | Diet Analysis | Food Comparison | Glycemic Index Chart | Insulin Index Chart | Blog | Subscribe | Sign Up

Limburger vs. Matzo — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison

Compare

Differences between Limburger and Matzo

  • Limburger has more Calcium, Phosphorus, Vitamin B12, and Vitamin A RAE, while Matzo has more Selenium, Iron, and Manganese.
  • Limburger's daily need coverage for Saturated Fat is 83% higher.
  • The amount of Sodium in Matzo is lower.

The food types used in this comparison are Cheese, limburger and Crackers, matzo, plain.

Infographic

Limburger vs Matzo infographic
Infographic link

Mineral Comparison

Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Contains more Calcium +3723.1%
Contains more Phosphorus +341.6%
Contains more Potassium +14.3%
Contains more Zinc +208.8%
Contains more Iron +2330.8%
Contains more Magnesium +19%
Contains less Sodium -100%
Contains more Copper +185.7%
Contains more Manganese +1610.5%
Contains more Selenium +154.5%
Calcium Iron Magnesium Phosphorus Potassium Sodium Zinc Copper Manganese Selenium 150% 5% 15% 169% 12% 105% 58% 7% 5% 80%
Calcium Iron Magnesium Phosphorus Potassium Sodium Zinc Copper Manganese Selenium 4% 119% 18% 39% 10% 0% 19% 20% 85% 202%
Contains more Calcium +3723.1%
Contains more Phosphorus +341.6%
Contains more Potassium +14.3%
Contains more Zinc +208.8%
Contains more Iron +2330.8%
Contains more Magnesium +19%
Contains less Sodium -100%
Contains more Copper +185.7%
Contains more Manganese +1610.5%
Contains more Selenium +154.5%

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
:
3
Matzo
Contains more Vitamin A +∞%
Contains more Vitamin E +283.3%
Contains more Vitamin D +∞%
Contains more Vitamin B2 +72.9%
Contains more Vitamin B5 +165.7%
Contains more Folate +241.2%
Contains more Vitamin B12 +∞%
Contains more Vitamin K +666.7%
Contains more Vitamin B1 +383.8%
Contains more Vitamin B3 +2363.3%
Contains more Vitamin B6 +33.7%
Vitamin A Vitamin E Vitamin D Vitamin C Vitamin B1 Vitamin B2 Vitamin B3 Vitamin B5 Vitamin B6 Folate Vitamin B12 Vitamin K 70% 5% 15% 0% 20% 117% 3% 71% 20% 44% 130% 6%
Vitamin A Vitamin E Vitamin D Vitamin C Vitamin B1 Vitamin B2 Vitamin B3 Vitamin B5 Vitamin B6 Folate Vitamin B12 Vitamin K 0% 2% 0% 0% 97% 68% 73% 27% 27% 13% 0% 1%
Contains more Vitamin A +∞%
Contains more Vitamin E +283.3%
Contains more Vitamin D +∞%
Contains more Vitamin B2 +72.9%
Contains more Vitamin B5 +165.7%
Contains more Folate +241.2%
Contains more Vitamin B12 +∞%
Contains more Vitamin K +666.7%
Contains more Vitamin B1 +383.8%
Contains more Vitamin B3 +2363.3%
Contains more Vitamin B6 +33.7%

Macronutrient Comparison

Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Contains more Protein +100.5%
Contains more Fats +1846.4%
Contains more Water +1026%
Contains more Other +531.7%
Contains more Carbs +16981.6%
20% 27% 48% 4%
Protein: 20.05 g
Fats: 27.25 g
Carbs: 0.49 g
Water: 48.42 g
Other: 3.79 g
10% 84% 4%
Protein: 10 g
Fats: 1.4 g
Carbs: 83.7 g
Water: 4.3 g
Other: 0.6 g
Contains more Protein +100.5%
Contains more Fats +1846.4%
Contains more Water +1026%
Contains more Other +531.7%
Contains more Carbs +16981.6%

Fat Type Comparison

Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Contains more Monounsaturated Fat +6676.4%
Contains less Saturated Fat -98.7%
Contains more Polyunsaturated fat +21.8%
65% 33% 2%
Saturated Fat: 16.746 g
Monounsaturated Fat: 8.606 g
Polyunsaturated fat: 0.495 g
24% 13% 63%
Saturated Fat: 0.226 g
Monounsaturated Fat: 0.127 g
Polyunsaturated fat: 0.603 g
Contains more Monounsaturated Fat +6676.4%
Contains less Saturated Fat -98.7%
Contains more Polyunsaturated fat +21.8%

Comparison summary table

Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
Limburger Matzo
Lower in Sugar ok
Lower in Sodium ok
Lower in Cholesterol ok
Lower in Saturated Fat ok
Lower in Glycemic Index ok
Lower in price ok
Rich in vitamins ok
Rich in minerals Equal

All nutrients comparison - raw data values

Nutrient Limburger Matzo Opinion
Net carbs 0.49g 80.7g Matzo
Protein 20.05g 10g Limburger
Fats 27.25g 1.4g Limburger
Carbs 0.49g 83.7g Matzo
Calories 327kcal 395kcal Matzo
Sugar 0.49g 0.29g Matzo
Fiber 0g 3g Matzo
Calcium 497mg 13mg Limburger
Iron 0.13mg 3.16mg Matzo
Magnesium 21mg 25mg Matzo
Phosphorus 393mg 89mg Limburger
Potassium 128mg 112mg Limburger
Sodium 800mg 0mg Matzo
Zinc 2.1mg 0.68mg Limburger
Copper 0.021mg 0.06mg Matzo
Manganese 0.038mg 0.65mg Matzo
Selenium 14.5µg 36.9µg Matzo
Vitamin A 1155IU 0IU Limburger
Vitamin A RAE 340µg 0µg Limburger
Vitamin E 0.23mg 0.06mg Limburger
Vitamin D 20IU 0IU Limburger
Vitamin D 0.5µg 0µg Limburger
Vitamin B1 0.08mg 0.387mg Matzo
Vitamin B2 0.503mg 0.291mg Limburger
Vitamin B3 0.158mg 3.892mg Matzo
Vitamin B5 1.177mg 0.443mg Limburger
Vitamin B6 0.086mg 0.115mg Matzo
Folate 58µg 17µg Limburger
Vitamin B12 1.04µg 0µg Limburger
Vitamin K 2.3µg 0.3µg Limburger
Tryptophan 0.289mg 0.116mg Limburger
Threonine 0.739mg 0.267mg Limburger
Isoleucine 1.219mg 0.371mg Limburger
Leucine 2.093mg 0.692mg Limburger
Lysine 1.675mg 0.193mg Limburger
Methionine 0.619mg 0.176mg Limburger
Phenylalanine 1.116mg 0.494mg Limburger
Valine 1.439mg 0.42mg Limburger
Histidine 0.578mg 0.213mg Limburger
Cholesterol 90mg 0mg Matzo
Saturated Fat 16.746g 0.226g Matzo
Monounsaturated Fat 8.606g 0.127g Limburger
Polyunsaturated fat 0.495g 0.603g Matzo

Which food is preferable for your diet?

ok
ok
is better in case of low diet
Limburger Matzo
Low Fats diet ok
Low Carbs diet ok
Low Calories diet ok
Low Glycemic Index diet ok

People also compare

Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score

The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
41%
Limburger
25%
Matzo
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
60%
Limburger
51%
Matzo

Comparison summary

Which food is lower in Sugar?
Matzo
Matzo is lower in Sugar (difference - 0.2g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Matzo
Matzo contains less Sodium (difference - 800mg)
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Matzo
Matzo is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 90mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Matzo
Matzo is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 16.52g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Matzo
Matzo is lower in glycemic index (difference - 27)
Which food is cheaper?
Matzo
Matzo is cheaper (difference - $3)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Limburger
Limburger is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is richer in minerals?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.

References

All the values for which the sources are not specified explicitly are taken from FDA’s Food Central. The exact link to the food presented on this page can be found below.

  1. Limburger - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/171243/nutrients
  2. Matzo - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/172740/nutrients

All the Daily Values are presented for males aged 31-50, for 2000-calorie diets.

Data provided by FoodStruct.com should be considered and used as information only. Please consult your physician before beginning any diet.