Limburger vs. Palm oil — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
How are Limburger and palm oil different?
- Limburger is higher in phosphorus, calcium, vitamin B12, vitamin B2, selenium, and vitamin B5; however, palm oil is richer in vitamin E.
- Daily need coverage for saturated fat for palm oil is 163% higher.
- Palm oil has less sodium.
- Palm oil has a lower glycemic index (0) than Limburger (27).
Cheese, limburger and Oil, palm are the varieties used in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +∞% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +∞% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +∞% |
| Contains more IronIron | +1200% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +∞% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +∞% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +∞% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +∞% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +∞% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -100% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin DVitamin D | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +∞% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +5033.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +6830.4% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +247.8% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +∞% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +∞% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +∞% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +267% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -66% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +329.9% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +1778.8% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Saturated fat | 16.746g | 49.3g | 148% |
| Fats | 27.25g | 100g | 112% |
| Vitamin E | 0.23mg | 15.94mg | 105% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 8.606g | 37g | 71% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.495g | 9.3g | 59% |
| Phosphorus | 393mg | 0mg | 56% |
| Calcium | 497mg | 0mg | 50% |
| Vitamin B12 | 1.04µg | 0µg | 43% |
| Protein | 20.05g | 0g | 40% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.503mg | 0mg | 39% |
| Vitamin A | 340µg | 0µg | 38% |
| Sodium | 800mg | 0mg | 35% |
| Cholesterol | 90mg | 0mg | 30% |
| Calories | 327kcal | 884kcal | 28% |
| Selenium | 14.5µg | 0µg | 26% |
| Vitamin B5 | 1.177mg | 0mg | 24% |
| Zinc | 2.1mg | 0mg | 19% |
| Folate | 58µg | 0µg | 15% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.086mg | 0mg | 7% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.08mg | 0mg | 7% |
| Magnesium | 21mg | 0mg | 5% |
| Vitamin K | 2.3µg | 8µg | 5% |
| Potassium | 128mg | 0mg | 4% |
| Vitamin D | 0.5µg | 3% | |
| Choline | 15.4mg | 0.3mg | 3% |
| Vitamin D | 20IU | 3% | |
| Manganese | 0.038mg | 2% | |
| Copper | 0.021mg | 0mg | 2% |
| Iron | 0.13mg | 0.01mg | 2% |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.158mg | 0mg | 1% |
| Net carbs | 0.49g | 0g | N/A |
| Carbs | 0.49g | 0g | 0% |
| Sugar | 0.49g | 0g | N/A |
| Tryptophan | 0.289mg | 0mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 0.739mg | 0mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 1.219mg | 0mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 2.093mg | 0mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 1.675mg | 0mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0.619mg | 0mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 1.116mg | 0mg | 0% |
| Valine | 1.439mg | 0mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0.578mg | 0mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
42%
26%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
60%
0%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Palm oil is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 90mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Palm oil is lower in Sugar (difference - 0.49g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Palm oil contains less Sodium (difference - 800mg)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Palm oil is lower in glycemic index (difference - 27)
Which food is cheaper?
Palm oil is cheaper (difference - $1)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Limburger is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 32.554g)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Limburger is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Limburger is relatively richer in vitamins