Limburger vs. Sugar substitute — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Summary of differences between Limburger and sugar substitute
- Limburger has more phosphorus, vitamin B2, vitamin B5, zinc, vitamin B6, and vitamin B1; however, sugar substitute is higher in calcium.
- Limburger covers your daily need for phosphorus, 55% more than sugar substitute.
- Limburger has 53 times more zinc than sugar substitute. While Limburger has 2.1mg of zinc, sugar substitute has only 0.04mg.
- Sugar substitute has less sodium.
- The glycemic index of sugar substitute is higher.
These are the specific foods used in this comparison Cheese, limburger and Sweeteners, sugar substitute, granulated, brown.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +250% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +228.2% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +200% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +5150% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +4812.5% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +72.7% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +∞% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +76.9% |
| Contains more IronIron | +23.1% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -28.5% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin DVitamin D | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +433.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +3253.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +1371.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +473.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +∞% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
20.05 g
Fats:
27.25 g
Carbs:
0.49 g
Water:
48.42 g
Other:
3.79 g
Protein:
2.06 g
Fats:
0 g
Carbs:
84.77 g
Water:
9.14 g
Other:
4.03 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +873.3% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +∞% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +429.8% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +17200% |
~equal in
Other
~4.03g
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Saturated fat | 16.746g | 76% | |
| Phosphorus | 393mg | 8mg | 55% |
| Vitamin B12 | 1.04µg | 43% | |
| Fats | 27.25g | 0g | 42% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.503mg | 0.015mg | 38% |
| Calcium | 497mg | 879mg | 38% |
| Vitamin A | 340µg | 38% | |
| Protein | 20.05g | 2.06g | 36% |
| Cholesterol | 90mg | 30% | |
| Carbs | 0.49g | 84.77g | 28% |
| Selenium | 14.5µg | 26% | |
| Vitamin B5 | 1.177mg | 0.08mg | 22% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 8.606g | 22% | |
| Zinc | 2.1mg | 0.04mg | 19% |
| Folate | 58µg | 15% | |
| Sodium | 800mg | 572mg | 10% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.08mg | 0.015mg | 5% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.086mg | 0.015mg | 5% |
| Magnesium | 21mg | 6mg | 4% |
| Choline | 15.4mg | 3% | |
| Potassium | 128mg | 39mg | 3% |
| Vitamin D | 0.5µg | 3% | |
| Vitamin D | 20IU | 3% | |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.495g | 3% | |
| Copper | 0.021mg | 0.007mg | 2% |
| Fiber | 0g | 0.6g | 2% |
| Vitamin E | 0.23mg | 2% | |
| Vitamin K | 2.3µg | 2% | |
| Calories | 327kcal | 347kcal | 1% |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.158mg | 1% | |
| Manganese | 0.038mg | 0.022mg | 1% |
| Starch | 3.52g | 1% | |
| Net carbs | 0.49g | 84.17g | N/A |
| Iron | 0.13mg | 0.16mg | 0% |
| Sugar | 0.49g | 4.03g | N/A |
| Tryptophan | 0.289mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.739mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 1.219mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 2.093mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 1.675mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.619mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 1.116mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 1.439mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.578mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
42%
1%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
60%
36%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Sugar substitute is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 90mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Sugar substitute contains less Sodium (difference - 228mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Sugar substitute is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 16.746g)
Which food is cheaper?
Sugar substitute is cheaper (difference - $3)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Limburger is lower in Sugar (difference - 3.54g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Limburger is lower in glycemic index (difference - 13)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Limburger is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Limburger is relatively richer in vitamins