Limburger vs. Sugar substitute — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Summary of differences between Limburger and Sugar substitute
- Limburger has more Phosphorus, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B5, Zinc, Vitamin B6, and Vitamin B1, however, Sugar substitute is higher in Calcium.
- Limburger covers your daily need of Phosphorus 55% more than Sugar substitute.
- Limburger has 53 times more Zinc than Sugar substitute. While Limburger has 2.1mg of Zinc, Sugar substitute has only 0.04mg.
- Sugar substitute has less Sodium.
These are the specific foods used in this comparison Cheese, limburger and Sweeteners, sugar substitute, granulated, brown.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Contains
more
Magnesium
+250%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+4812.5%
Contains
more
Potassium
+228.2%
Contains
more
Zinc
+5150%
Contains
more
Copper
+200%
Contains
more
Manganese
+72.7%
Contains
more
Calcium
+76.9%
Contains
more
Iron
+23.1%
Contains
less
Sodium
-28.5%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+250%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+4812.5%
Contains
more
Potassium
+228.2%
Contains
more
Zinc
+5150%
Contains
more
Copper
+200%
Contains
more
Manganese
+72.7%
Contains
more
Calcium
+76.9%
Contains
more
Iron
+23.1%
Contains
less
Sodium
-28.5%
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
:
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+433.3%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+3253.3%
Contains
more
Vitamin B5
+1371.3%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+473.3%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+433.3%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+3253.3%
Contains
more
Vitamin B5
+1371.3%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+473.3%
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Contains
more
Protein
+873.3%
Contains
more
Fats
+∞%
Contains
more
Water
+429.8%
Contains
more
Carbs
+17200%
Equal in Other - 4.03
Protein:
20.05 g
Fats:
27.25 g
Carbs:
0.49 g
Water:
48.42 g
Other:
3.79 g
Protein:
2.06 g
Fats:
0 g
Carbs:
84.77 g
Water:
9.14 g
Other:
4.03 g
Contains
more
Protein
+873.3%
Contains
more
Fats
+∞%
Contains
more
Water
+429.8%
Contains
more
Carbs
+17200%
Equal in Other - 4.03
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Net carbs | 0.49g | 84.17g |
|
| Protein | 20.05g | 2.06g |
|
| Fats | 27.25g | 0g |
|
| Carbs | 0.49g | 84.77g |
|
| Calories | 327kcal | 347kcal |
|
| Starch | 3.52g |
|
|
| Sugar | 0.49g | 4.03g |
|
| Fiber | 0g | 0.6g |
|
| Calcium | 497mg | 879mg |
|
| Iron | 0.13mg | 0.16mg |
|
| Magnesium | 21mg | 6mg |
|
| Phosphorus | 393mg | 8mg |
|
| Potassium | 128mg | 39mg |
|
| Sodium | 800mg | 572mg |
|
| Zinc | 2.1mg | 0.04mg |
|
| Copper | 0.021mg | 0.007mg |
|
| Manganese | 0.038mg | 0.022mg |
|
| Selenium | 14.5µg |
|
|
| Vitamin A | 1155IU |
|
|
| Vitamin A RAE | 340µg |
|
|
| Vitamin E | 0.23mg |
|
|
| Vitamin D | 20IU |
|
|
| Vitamin D | 0.5µg |
|
|
| Vitamin B1 | 0.08mg | 0.015mg |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.503mg | 0.015mg |
|
| Vitamin B3 | 0.158mg |
|
|
| Vitamin B5 | 1.177mg | 0.08mg |
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.086mg | 0.015mg |
|
| Folate | 58µg |
|
|
| Vitamin B12 | 1.04µg |
|
|
| Vitamin K | 2.3µg |
|
|
| Tryptophan | 0.289mg |
|
|
| Threonine | 0.739mg |
|
|
| Isoleucine | 1.219mg |
|
|
| Leucine | 2.093mg |
|
|
| Lysine | 1.675mg |
|
|
| Methionine | 0.619mg |
|
|
| Phenylalanine | 1.116mg |
|
|
| Valine | 1.439mg |
|
|
| Histidine | 0.578mg |
|
|
| Cholesterol | 90mg |
|
|
| Saturated Fat | 16.746g |
|
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 8.606g |
|
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.495g |
|
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
41%
1%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
60%
36%
Comparison summary
Which food contains less Sodium?
Sugar substitute contains less Sodium (difference - 228mg)
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Sugar substitute is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 90mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Sugar substitute is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 16.746g)
Which food is cheaper?
Sugar substitute is cheaper (difference - $3)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Limburger is lower in Sugar (difference - 3.54g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Limburger is lower in glycemic index (difference - 13)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Limburger is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Limburger is relatively richer in vitamins