Mars vs. Pork chop — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Important differences between mars and pork chop
- Mars has more fiber than pork chop.
- Mars's daily need coverage for saturated fat is 37% more.
- Pork chop contains less sugar.
- Mars has a higher glycemic index. The glycemic index of mars is 62, while the glycemic index of pork chop is 0.
The food varieties used in the comparison are Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, M&M's Crispy Chocolate Candies and Pork, fresh, loin, blade (chops), bone-in, separable lean and fat, cooked, broiled.
Infographic

Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Contains more CalciumCalcium | +60.7% |
Contains less SodiumSodium | -45.6% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Contains more FatsFats | +34.6% |
Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
Contains more OtherOther | +379.2% |
Contains more ProteinProtein | +454.2% |
Contains more WaterWater | +3514.7% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -62.8% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
![]() |
![]() |
||
Lower in Sugar |
![]() |
||
Lower in Sodium |
![]() |
||
Lower in Saturated fat |
![]() |
||
Lower in Glycemic Index |
![]() |
||
Lower in price |
![]() |
||
Rich in minerals |
![]() |
||
Rich in vitamins |
![]() |
||
Lower in Cholesterol |
![]() |
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
Nutrient | ![]() |
![]() |
DV% diff. |
Selenium | 36.4µg | 66% | |
Vitamin B3 | 7.927mg | 50% | |
Vitamin B1 | 0.49mg | 41% | |
Protein | 4.28g | 23.72g | 39% |
Vitamin B6 | 0.489mg | 38% | |
Phosphorus | 241mg | 34% | |
Saturated fat | 11.651g | 4.339g | 33% |
Zinc | 3.15mg | 29% | |
Vitamin B12 | 0.66µg | 28% | |
Vitamin B2 | 0.313mg | 24% | |
Carbs | 72.4g | 0g | 24% |
Cholesterol | 12mg | 78mg | 22% |
Vitamin B5 | 1.104mg | 22% | |
Polyunsaturated fat | 1.894g | 13% | |
Monounsaturated fat | 4.887g | 12% | |
Choline | 67.5mg | 12% | |
Calories | 475kcal | 231kcal | 12% |
Copper | 0.105mg | 12% | |
Potassium | 315mg | 9% | |
Fats | 19.32g | 14.35g | 8% |
Fiber | 2g | 0g | 8% |
Vitamin D | 40IU | 5% | |
Vitamin D | 1µg | 5% | |
Magnesium | 20mg | 5% | |
Calcium | 90mg | 56mg | 3% |
Sodium | 136mg | 74mg | 3% |
Vitamin C | 0.5mg | 0mg | 1% |
Vitamin E | 0.21mg | 1% | |
Net carbs | 70.4g | 0g | N/A |
Iron | 0.86mg | 0.87mg | 0% |
Sugar | 58.94g | 0g | N/A |
Vitamin A | 4µg | 0% | |
Manganese | 0.01mg | 0% | |
Trans fat | 0.131g | 0.066g | N/A |
Tryptophan | 0.282mg | 0% | |
Threonine | 1.043mg | 0% | |
Isoleucine | 1.123mg | 0% | |
Leucine | 1.952mg | 0% | |
Lysine | 2.109mg | 0% | |
Methionine | 0.65mg | 0% | |
Phenylalanine | 0.985mg | 0% | |
Valine | 1.2mg | 0% | |
Histidine | 0.965mg | 0% | |
Omega-3 - DHA | 0.001g | N/A | |
Omega-3 - ALA | 0.065g | N/A | |
Omega-3 - DPA | 0.011g | N/A | |
Omega-6 - Gamma-linoleic acid | 0.003g | N/A | |
Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid | 0.065g | N/A | |
Omega-6 - Linoleic acid | 0.922g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?


is better in case of low diet
![]() |
![]() |
|
Low Calories diet |
![]() |
|
Low Fats diet |
![]() |
|
Low Carbs diet |
![]() |
|
Low Glycemic Index diet |
![]() |
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
0%

51%

Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
8%

53%

Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?

Pork chop is lower in Sugar (difference - 58.94g)
Which food contains less Sodium?

Pork chop contains less Sodium (difference - 62mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?

Pork chop is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 7.312g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?

Pork chop is lower in glycemic index (difference - 62)
Which food is cheaper?

Pork chop is cheaper (difference - $1.2)
Which food is richer in minerals?

Pork chop is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?

Pork chop is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?

Mars is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 66mg)