Matzo vs. Apple strudel — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Differences between Matzo and Apple strudel
- Matzo has more Selenium, Iron, Vitamin B1, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B2, Manganese, and Phosphorus, while Apple strudel has more Vitamin B12, and Vitamin E.
- Matzo's daily need coverage for Selenium is 56% higher.
- Apple strudel contains 12 times less Vitamin B3 than Matzo. Matzo contains 3.892mg of Vitamin B3, while Apple strudel contains 0.33mg.
- The amount of Saturated Fat in Matzo is lower.
The food types used in this comparison are Crackers, matzo, plain and Strudel, apple.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +177.8% |
| Contains more IronIron | +652.4% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +100% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +257.9% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +169.7% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -100% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +242.1% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +504.9% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +15.4% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +33% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +867.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +1064% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +1079.4% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +64.1% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +150% |
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +2266.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +866.7% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +64.7% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +61.1% |
~equal in
Vitamin D
~0µg
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
10 g
Fats:
1.4 g
Carbs:
83.7 g
Water:
4.3 g
Other:
0.6 g
Protein:
3.3 g
Fats:
11.2 g
Carbs:
41.1 g
Water:
43.5 g
Other:
0.9 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +203% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +103.6% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +700% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +911.6% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +50% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated Fat:
Sat. Fat
0.226 g
Monounsaturated Fat:
Mono. Fat
0.127 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.603 g
Saturated Fat:
Sat. Fat
2.044 g
Monounsaturated Fat:
Mono. Fat
3.267 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
5.315 g
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated Fat | -88.9% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated Fat | +2472.4% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +781.4% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Calories | 395kcal | 274kcal |
|
| Protein | 10g | 3.3g |
|
| Fats | 1.4g | 11.2g |
|
| Vitamin C | 0mg | 1.7mg |
|
| Net carbs | 80.7g | 38.9g |
|
| Carbs | 83.7g | 41.1g |
|
| Cholesterol | 0mg | 6mg |
|
| Magnesium | 25mg | 9mg |
|
| Calcium | 13mg | 15mg |
|
| Potassium | 112mg | 149mg |
|
| Iron | 3.16mg | 0.42mg |
|
| Sugar | 0.29g | 25.75g |
|
| Fiber | 3g | 2.2g |
|
| Copper | 0.06mg | 0.03mg |
|
| Zinc | 0.68mg | 0.19mg |
|
| Phosphorus | 89mg | 33mg |
|
| Sodium | 0mg | 135mg |
|
| Vitamin A | 0IU | 30IU |
|
| Vitamin A | 0µg | 6µg |
|
| Vitamin E | 0.06mg | 1.42mg |
|
| Manganese | 0.65mg | 0.19mg |
|
| Selenium | 36.9µg | 6.1µg |
|
| Vitamin B1 | 0.387mg | 0.04mg |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.291mg | 0.025mg |
|
| Vitamin B3 | 3.892mg | 0.33mg |
|
| Vitamin B5 | 0.443mg | 0.27mg |
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.115mg | 0.046mg |
|
| Vitamin B12 | 0µg | 0.22µg |
|
| Vitamin K | 0.3µg | 2.9µg |
|
| Folate | 17µg | 28µg |
|
| Choline | 10.8mg | 17.4mg |
|
| Saturated Fat | 0.226g | 2.044g |
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 0.127g | 3.267g |
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.603g | 5.315g |
|
| Tryptophan | 0.116mg | 0.039mg |
|
| Threonine | 0.267mg | 0.119mg |
|
| Isoleucine | 0.371mg | 0.147mg |
|
| Leucine | 0.692mg | 0.257mg |
|
| Lysine | 0.193mg | 153mg |
|
| Methionine | 0.176mg | 0.067mg |
|
| Phenylalanine | 0.494mg | 0.151mg |
|
| Valine | 0.42mg | 0.164mg |
|
| Histidine | 0.213mg | 0.076mg |
|
| Omega-3 - DHA | 0g | 0.001g |
|
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
24%
12%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
51%
14%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Matzo is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 6mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Matzo is lower in Sugar (difference - 25.46g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Matzo contains less Sodium (difference - 135mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Matzo is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 1.818g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Matzo is lower in glycemic index (difference - 59)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Matzo is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.