Nattō vs Buckwheat - In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Differences between Nattō and Buckwheat
- Nattō has more Iron and Calcium, while Buckwheat has more Copper, Vitamin B3, Magnesium, Phosphorus, Vitamin B5, Fiber, Vitamin B2 and Vitamin C.
- Nattō's daily need coverage for Iron is 80% higher.
- Buckwheat contains 12 times less Calcium than Nattō. Nattō contains 217mg of Calcium, while Buckwheat contains 18mg.
The food types used in this comparison are Natto and Buckwheat.
Infographic
Copy infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" chart below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
:
Contains
more
Iron
+290.9%
Contains
more
Calcium
+1105.6%
Contains
more
Potassium
+58.5%
Contains
more
Zinc
+26.3%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+100.9%
Contains
more
Copper
+64.9%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+99.4%
Contains
less
Sodium
-85.7%
Contains
more
Iron
+290.9%
Contains
more
Calcium
+1105.6%
Contains
more
Potassium
+58.5%
Contains
more
Zinc
+26.3%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+100.9%
Contains
more
Copper
+64.9%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+99.4%
Contains
less
Sodium
-85.7%
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" chart below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
:
Contains
more
Vitamin C
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+58.4%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+123.7%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin B5
+473.5%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+61.5%
Contains
more
Folate
+275%
Contains
more
Vitamin C
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+58.4%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+123.7%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin B5
+473.5%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+61.5%
Contains
more
Folate
+275%
Vitamin and Mineral Summary Scores
Summary score is calculated by summing up the daily values contained in 300 grams of the product. Obviously the more the food fulfils human daily needs, the more the summary score is
Vitamin Summary Score
20
33
Mineral Summary Score
114
109
Macronutrients Comparison
Macronutrient comparison charts compare the amount of protein, total fats and total carbohydrates in 300 grams of the food. The displayed values show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
Protein
116%
80%
Carbohydrates
13%
72%
Fats
51%
16%
Comparison summary table
Pay attention at the most right column. It shows the amounts side by side, making it easier to realize the amount of difference.
|
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Sugars |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Lower in glycemic index |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol | Equal | ||
| Rich in minerals | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
Which food is preferable in case of diets?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low glycemic index diet |
|
People also compare
Comparison summary
Which food is cheaper?
Nattō is cheaper (difference - $0.5)
Which food contains less Sugars?
Buckwheat contains less Sugars (difference - 4.89g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Buckwheat contains less Sodium (difference - 6mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Buckwheat is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 0.85g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Buckwheat is lower in glycemic index (difference - 2)
Which food contains less Cholesterol?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Cholesterol (0 mg)
Which food is richer in minerals?
?
It cannot be definitely stated which food is richer in minerals. See charts below for detailed information.
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be definitely stated which food is richer in vitamins. See charts below for detailed information.
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
In the column "Opinion" we made some assumptions which could be controversial. For instance we are assuming that less saturated fats is good for you. Please ignore this column if you have your own opinion.We marked the nutrients, comparison of which we considered as not meaningful, as "N/A"
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Calories | 211 | 343 |
|
| Protein | 19.4 | 13.25 |
|
| Fats | 11 | 3.4 |
|
| Vitamin C | 13 | 0 |
|
| Carbs | 12.68 | 71.5 |
|
| Cholesterol | 0 | 0 | |
| Vitamin D | 0 | 0 | |
| Iron | 8.6 | 2.2 |
|
| Calcium | 217 | 18 |
|
| Potassium | 729 | 460 |
|
| Magnesium | 115 | 231 |
|
| Sugars | 4.89 |
|
|
| Fiber | 5.4 | 10 |
|
| Copper | 0.667 | 1.1 |
|
| Zinc | 3.03 | 2.4 |
|
| Starch | |||
| Phosphorus | 174 | 347 |
|
| Sodium | 7 | 1 |
|
| Vitamin A | 0 | 0 | |
| Vitamin E | 0.01 |
|
|
| Vitamin D | 0 | 0 | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.16 | 0.101 |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.19 | 0.425 |
|
| Vitamin B3 | 0 | 7.02 |
|
| Vitamin B5 | 0.215 | 1.233 |
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.13 | 0.21 |
|
| Vitamin B12 | 0 | 0 | |
| Vitamin K | 23.1 |
|
|
| Folate | 8 | 30 |
|
| Trans Fat | 0 |
|
|
| Saturated Fat | 1.591 | 0.741 |
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 2.43 | 1.04 |
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 6.21 | 1.039 |
|
| Tryptophan | 0.223 | 0.192 |
|
| Threonine | 0.813 | 0.506 |
|
| Isoleucine | 0.931 | 0.498 |
|
| Leucine | 1.509 | 0.832 |
|
| Lysine | 1.145 | 0.672 |
|
| Methionine | 0.208 | 0.172 |
|
| Phenylalanine | 0.941 | 0.52 |
|
| Valine | 1.018 | 0.678 |
|
| Histidine | 0.512 | 0.309 |
|
| Fructose |