Palm oil vs. Chuck steak — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
A recap on differences between palm oil and chuck steak
- Palm oil has more vitamin E; however, chuck steak is higher in vitamin B12, zinc, selenium, iron, vitamin B3, vitamin B6, and phosphorus.
- Palm oil covers your daily saturated fat needs 203% more than chuck steak.
- Chuck steak contains 159 times less vitamin E than palm oil. Palm oil contains 15.94mg of vitamin E, while chuck steak contains 0.1mg.
- Chuck steak has less saturated fat.
Food varieties used in this article are Oil, palm and Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -100% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +∞% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +∞% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +∞% |
| Contains more IronIron | +24400% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +∞% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +∞% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +∞% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +∞% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +15840% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +400% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +∞% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +26233.3% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
0 g
Fats:
100 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
0 g
Other:
0 g
Protein:
24.98 g
Fats:
19.64 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
55.22 g
Other:
0.16 g
| Contains more FatsFats | +409.2% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +∞% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +∞% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +∞% |
~equal in
Carbs
~0g
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
49.3 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
37 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
9.3 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
8.66 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
9.457 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.81 g
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +291.2% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +1048.1% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -82.4% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar | Equal | ||
| Lower in Glycemic Index | Equal | ||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Saturated fat | 49.3g | 8.66g | 185% |
| Vitamin B12 | 0µg | 3.03µg | 126% |
| Fats | 100g | 19.64g | 124% |
| Vitamin E | 15.94mg | 0.1mg | 106% |
| Zinc | 0mg | 8.68mg | 79% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 37g | 9.457g | 69% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 9.3g | 0.81g | 57% |
| Protein | 0g | 24.98g | 50% |
| Selenium | 0µg | 27.5µg | 50% |
| Iron | 0.01mg | 2.45mg | 31% |
| Calories | 884kcal | 277kcal | 30% |
| Vitamin B3 | 0mg | 4.663mg | 29% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0mg | 0.373mg | 29% |
| Cholesterol | 0mg | 87mg | 29% |
| Phosphorus | 0mg | 193mg | 28% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0mg | 0.191mg | 15% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0mg | 0.752mg | 15% |
| Choline | 0.3mg | 79mg | 14% |
| Potassium | 0mg | 325mg | 10% |
| Copper | 0mg | 0.077mg | 9% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0mg | 0.066mg | 6% |
| Vitamin K | 8µg | 1.6µg | 5% |
| Magnesium | 0mg | 22mg | 5% |
| Sodium | 0mg | 71mg | 3% |
| Calcium | 0mg | 16mg | 2% |
| Folate | 0µg | 6µg | 2% |
| Vitamin A | 0µg | 7µg | 1% |
| Vitamin D | 5IU | 1% | |
| Manganese | 0.012mg | 1% | |
| Vitamin D | 0.1µg | 1% | |
| Trans fat | 1.287g | N/A | |
| Tryptophan | 0mg | 0.281mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 0mg | 1.099mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 0mg | 1.062mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 0mg | 2.009mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 0mg | 2.184mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0mg | 0.709mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 0mg | 0.951mg | 0% |
| Valine | 0mg | 1.129mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0mg | 0.809mg | 0% |
| Omega-3 - EPA | 0g | 0.001g | N/A |
| Omega-3 - ALA | 0.041g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - DPA | 0g | 0.004g | N/A |
| Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid | 0.006g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Linoleic acid | 0.619g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet | Equal | |
| Low Glycemic Index diet | Equal | |
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
26%
55%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
0%
65%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Palm oil is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 87mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Palm oil contains less Sodium (difference - 71mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Chuck steak is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 40.64g)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Chuck steak is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Chuck steak is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food contains less Sugar?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Sugar (0 g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
?
The foods have equal glycemic indexes (0)
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($2)