Pimiento vs. Flank steak — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Differences between pimiento and flank steak
- Pimiento has more vitamin C and vitamin A, while flank steak has more vitamin B12, selenium, zinc, vitamin B3, vitamin B6, phosphorus, and choline.
- Pimiento's daily need coverage for vitamin C is 94% higher.
- Flank steak has a lower glycemic index. The glycemic index of flank steak is 0, while the glycemic index of pimiento is 45.
The food types used in this comparison are Pimento, canned and Beef, flank, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -75% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +922.2% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +283.3% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +233.3% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +114.6% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +67.3% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +2478.9% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +1135.3% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +14600% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +81.6% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +492.9% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +341.2% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +121.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +1097.2% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +5350% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +169.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +50% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +1573% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
1.1 g
Fats:
0.3 g
Carbs:
5.1 g
Water:
93.1 g
Other:
0.4 g
Protein:
27.66 g
Fats:
8.23 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
64.17 g
Other:
0 g
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +45.1% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +-766.7% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +2414.5% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +2643.3% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.045 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.02 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.161 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
3.395 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
3.317 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.322 g
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -98.7% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +16485% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +100% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin C | 84.9mg | 0mg | 94% |
| Vitamin B12 | 0µg | 1.63µg | 68% |
| Selenium | 0.2µg | 29.4µg | 53% |
| Protein | 1.1g | 27.66g | 53% |
| Zinc | 0.19mg | 4.9mg | 43% |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.615mg | 7.363mg | 42% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.215mg | 0.579mg | 28% |
| Phosphorus | 17mg | 210mg | 28% |
| Cholesterol | 0mg | 79mg | 26% |
| Choline | 6.3mg | 105.4mg | 18% |
| Saturated fat | 0.045g | 3.395g | 15% |
| Vitamin A | 133µg | 0µg | 15% |
| Fats | 0.3g | 8.23g | 12% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.01mg | 0.545mg | 11% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.02g | 3.317g | 8% |
| Fiber | 1.9g | 0g | 8% |
| Calories | 23kcal | 192kcal | 8% |
| Vitamin K | 8.3µg | 1.4µg | 6% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.06mg | 0.133mg | 6% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.017mg | 0.075mg | 5% |
| Potassium | 158mg | 339mg | 5% |
| Manganese | 0.092mg | 0.009mg | 4% |
| Copper | 0.049mg | 0.082mg | 4% |
| Magnesium | 6mg | 23mg | 4% |
| Vitamin E | 0.69mg | 0.38mg | 2% |
| Sodium | 14mg | 56mg | 2% |
| Carbs | 5.1g | 0g | 2% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.161g | 0.322g | 1% |
| Iron | 1.68mg | 1.74mg | 1% |
| Calcium | 6mg | 20mg | 1% |
| Folate | 6µg | 9µg | 1% |
| Net carbs | 3.2g | 0g | N/A |
| Sugar | 2.71g | 0g | N/A |
| Tryptophan | 0.014mg | 0.182mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 0.04mg | 1.105mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 0.036mg | 1.259mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 0.058mg | 2.201mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 0.049mg | 2.338mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0.013mg | 0.72mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 0.034mg | 1.093mg | 0% |
| Valine | 0.046mg | 1.372mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0.022mg | 0.883mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
35%
49%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
13%
54%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Pimiento is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 79mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Pimiento contains less Sodium (difference - 42mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Pimiento is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 3.35g)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Flank steak is lower in Sugar (difference - 2.71g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Flank steak is lower in glycemic index (difference - 45)
Which food is cheaper?
Flank steak is cheaper (difference - $1)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Flank steak is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.