Polish sausage vs. Beef shank — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Summary of differences between Polish sausage and Beef shank
- Polish sausage has more Vitamin B1, however, Beef shank is higher in Vitamin B12, Zinc, Iron, Selenium, Phosphorus, Vitamin B3, and Vitamin B6.
- Beef shank covers your daily need of Vitamin B12 117% more than Polish sausage.
- Polish sausage has 24 times more Sodium than Beef shank. While Polish sausage has 1540mg of Sodium, Beef shank has only 64mg.
These are the specific foods used in this comparison Sausage, Polish, beef with chicken, hot and Beef, shank crosscuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, simmered.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +145% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +114.3% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +166.7% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +88.6% |
| Contains more IronIron | +338.6% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +91.1% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +443.5% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +93.4% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -95.8% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +69.5% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +258.6% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +41.9% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +71.1% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +94.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +286.7% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +400% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
17.6 g
Fats:
19.4 g
Carbs:
3.6 g
Water:
55.2 g
Other:
4.2 g
Protein:
33.68 g
Fats:
6.36 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
58.21 g
Other:
1.75 g
| Contains more FatsFats | +205% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +140% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +91.4% |
~equal in
Water
~58.21g
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated Fat:
Sat. Fat
8.01 g
Monounsaturated Fat:
Mono. Fat
9.7 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.79 g
Saturated Fat:
Sat. Fat
2.29 g
Monounsaturated Fat:
Mono. Fat
2.86 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.21 g
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated Fat | +239.2% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +276.2% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated Fat | -71.4% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Calories | 259kcal | 201kcal |
|
| Protein | 17.6g | 33.68g |
|
| Fats | 19.4g | 6.36g |
|
| Net carbs | 3.6g | 0g |
|
| Carbs | 3.6g | 0g |
|
| Cholesterol | 66mg | 78mg |
|
| Magnesium | 14mg | 30mg |
|
| Calcium | 12mg | 32mg |
|
| Potassium | 237mg | 447mg |
|
| Iron | 0.88mg | 3.86mg |
|
| Copper | 0.09mg | 0.172mg |
|
| Zinc | 1.93mg | 10.49mg |
|
| Phosphorus | 136mg | 263mg |
|
| Sodium | 1540mg | 64mg |
|
| Manganese | 0.049mg | 0.02mg |
|
| Selenium | 17.7µg | 30µg |
|
| Vitamin B1 | 0.502mg | 0.14mg |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.148mg | 0.21mg |
|
| Vitamin B3 | 3.443mg | 5.89mg |
|
| Vitamin B5 | 0.45mg | 0.41mg |
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.19mg | 0.37mg |
|
| Vitamin B12 | 0.98µg | 3.79µg |
|
| Folate | 2µg | 10µg |
|
| Saturated Fat | 8.01g | 2.29g |
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 9.7g | 2.86g |
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.79g | 0.21g |
|
| Tryptophan | 0.138mg | 0.377mg |
|
| Threonine | 0.591mg | 1.471mg |
|
| Isoleucine | 0.611mg | 1.514mg |
|
| Leucine | 1.076mg | 2.662mg |
|
| Lysine | 1.11mg | 2.802mg |
|
| Methionine | 0.379mg | 0.862mg |
|
| Phenylalanine | 0.539mg | 1.315mg |
|
| Valine | 0.679mg | 1.638mg |
|
| Histidine | 0.444mg | 1.153mg |
|
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
32%
60%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
51%
85%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Polish sausage is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 12mg)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Polish sausage is lower in glycemic index (difference - 0)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Beef shank is lower in Sugar (difference - 0g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Beef shank contains less Sodium (difference - 1476mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Beef shank is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 5.72g)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Beef shank is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.