Rambutan vs. Chuck steak — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Differences between rambutan and chuck steak
- Rambutan is higher in manganese; however, chuck steak is richer in vitamin B12, zinc, vitamin B6, phosphorus, iron, vitamin B3, vitamin B5, and vitamin B2.
- Chuck steak's daily need coverage for vitamin B12 is 126% higher.
- Rambutan has 29 times more manganese than chuck steak. While rambutan has 0.343mg of manganese, chuck steak has only 0.012mg.
- Chuck steak has a lower glycemic index (0) than rambutan (59).
The food types used in this comparison are Rambutan, canned, syrup pack and Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +37.5% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -84.5% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +2758.3% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +214.3% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +673.8% |
| Contains more IronIron | +600% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +16.7% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +10750% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +2044.4% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +33.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +407.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +768.2% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +244.9% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +4077.8% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +1765% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
0.65 g
Fats:
0.21 g
Carbs:
20.87 g
Water:
78.04 g
Other:
0.23 g
Protein:
24.98 g
Fats:
19.64 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
55.22 g
Other:
0.16 g
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +41.3% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +43.8% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +3743.1% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +9252.4% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin B12 | 0µg | 3.03µg | 126% |
| Zinc | 0.08mg | 8.68mg | 78% |
| Selenium | 27.5µg | 50% | |
| Protein | 0.65g | 24.98g | 49% |
| Saturated fat | 8.66g | 39% | |
| Fats | 0.21g | 19.64g | 30% |
| Cholesterol | 0mg | 87mg | 29% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.02mg | 0.373mg | 27% |
| Iron | 0.35mg | 2.45mg | 26% |
| Phosphorus | 9mg | 193mg | 26% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 9.457g | 24% | |
| Vitamin B3 | 1.352mg | 4.663mg | 21% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.018mg | 0.752mg | 15% |
| Manganese | 0.343mg | 0.012mg | 14% |
| Choline | 79mg | 14% | |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.022mg | 0.191mg | 13% |
| Calories | 82kcal | 277kcal | 10% |
| Potassium | 42mg | 325mg | 8% |
| Carbs | 20.87g | 0g | 7% |
| Vitamin C | 4.9mg | 0mg | 5% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.81g | 5% | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.013mg | 0.066mg | 4% |
| Fiber | 0.9g | 0g | 4% |
| Magnesium | 7mg | 22mg | 4% |
| Sodium | 11mg | 71mg | 3% |
| Folate | 8µg | 6µg | 1% |
| Vitamin E | 0.1mg | 1% | |
| Vitamin A | 0µg | 7µg | 1% |
| Vitamin K | 1.6µg | 1% | |
| Vitamin D | 5IU | 1% | |
| Calcium | 22mg | 16mg | 1% |
| Copper | 0.066mg | 0.077mg | 1% |
| Vitamin D | 0.1µg | 1% | |
| Net carbs | 19.97g | 0g | N/A |
| Trans fat | 0g | 1.287g | N/A |
| Tryptophan | 0.281mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 1.099mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 1.062mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 2.009mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 2.184mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.709mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.951mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 1.129mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.809mg | 0% | |
| Omega-3 - EPA | 0.001g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - ALA | 0.041g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - DPA | 0.004g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid | 0.006g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Linoleic acid | 0.619g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
5%
55%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
10%
65%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Rambutan is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 87mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Rambutan is lower in Sugar (difference - 0g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Rambutan contains less Sodium (difference - 60mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Rambutan is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 8.66g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Chuck steak is lower in glycemic index (difference - 59)
Which food is cheaper?
Chuck steak is cheaper (difference - $2)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Chuck steak is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Chuck steak is relatively richer in vitamins