Shark fin soup vs. Haddock — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
The main differences between shark fin soup and haddock
- Shark fin soup has more iron and copper; however, haddock has more vitamin B12, phosphorus, vitamin B6, vitamin B3, potassium, and vitamin B5.
- Daily need coverage for vitamin B12 for haddock is 81% higher.
- Haddock has 4 times less iron than shark fin soup. Shark fin soup has 0.94mg of iron, while haddock has 0.21mg.
- Haddock is lower in sodium.
Food types used in this article are Soup, shark fin, restaurant-prepared and Fish, haddock, cooked, dry heat.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more IronIron | +347.6% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +315.4% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +105% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +84.6% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +271.4% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +40% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +562.3% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +1223.8% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -47.9% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +17.4% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +76.9% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +735.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +280% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +1157.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +1021.1% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +44.4% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
3.2 g
Fats:
2 g
Carbs:
3.8 g
Water:
90.13 g
Other:
0.87 g
Protein:
19.99 g
Fats:
0.55 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
79.65 g
Other:
0 g
| Contains more FatsFats | +263.6% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +13.2% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +-557.9% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +524.7% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.501 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.583 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.341 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.111 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.074 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.204 g
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +687.8% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +67.2% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -77.8% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Rich in minerals | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin B12 | 0.19µg | 2.13µg | 81% |
| Selenium | 31.7µg | 58% | |
| Phosphorus | 21mg | 278mg | 37% |
| Protein | 3.2g | 19.99g | 34% |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.493mg | 4.119mg | 23% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.026mg | 0.327mg | 23% |
| Cholesterol | 2mg | 66mg | 21% |
| Choline | 79.6mg | 14% | |
| Sodium | 501mg | 261mg | 10% |
| Copper | 0.108mg | 0.026mg | 9% |
| Potassium | 53mg | 351mg | 9% |
| Iron | 0.94mg | 0.21mg | 9% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.13mg | 0.494mg | 7% |
| Magnesium | 7mg | 26mg | 5% |
| Zinc | 0.82mg | 0.4mg | 4% |
| Vitamin E | 0.55mg | 4% | |
| Vitamin D | 23IU | 3% | |
| Vitamin D | 0.6µg | 3% | |
| Saturated fat | 0.501g | 0.111g | 2% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.039mg | 0.069mg | 2% |
| Calories | 46kcal | 90kcal | 2% |
| Fats | 2g | 0.55g | 2% |
| Vitamin A | 0µg | 21µg | 2% |
| Carbs | 3.8g | 0g | 1% |
| Folate | 9µg | 13µg | 1% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.583g | 0.074g | 1% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.341g | 0.204g | 1% |
| Vitamin C | 0.1mg | 0mg | 0% |
| Net carbs | 3.8g | 0g | N/A |
| Calcium | 10mg | 14mg | 0% |
| Manganese | 0.024mg | 0.013mg | 0% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.027mg | 0.023mg | 0% |
| Vitamin K | 0.1µg | 0% | |
| Trans fat | 0.005g | N/A | |
| Tryptophan | 0.26mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 1.015mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 1.067mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 1.882mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 2.126mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.686mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.904mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 1.193mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.682mg | 0% | |
| Omega-3 - EPA | 0.086g | 0.051g | N/A |
| Omega-3 - DHA | 0.121g | 0.109g | N/A |
| Omega-3 - DPA | 0.042g | 0.006g | N/A |
| Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid | 0.001g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
5%
42%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
18%
41%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Shark fin soup is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 64mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Shark fin soup is lower in Sugar (difference - 0g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Shark fin soup is lower in glycemic index (difference - 0)
Which food is cheaper?
Shark fin soup is cheaper (difference - $16)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Haddock contains less Sodium (difference - 240mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Haddock is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 0.39g)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Haddock is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is richer in minerals?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.