Snickers vs. Tomato paste — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
A recap on differences between snickers and tomato paste
- Snickers is higher in calcium, yet tomato paste is higher in iron, vitamin A, vitamin C, and fiber.
- Snickers covers your daily saturated fat needs 63% more than tomato paste.
- Snickers contains 4 times more sugar than tomato paste. While snickers contains 46.54g of sugar, tomato paste contains only 12.18g.
- The amount of saturated fat in tomato paste is lower.
Food varieties used in this article are Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, SNICKERS CRUNCHER and Tomato products, canned, paste, without salt added.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +150% |
| Contains more IronIron | +338.2% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -68.8% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +4280% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
6.86 g
Fats:
24.38 g
Carbs:
62.85 g
Water:
4.47 g
Other:
1.44 g
Protein:
4.32 g
Fats:
0.47 g
Carbs:
18.91 g
Water:
73.5 g
Other:
2.8 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +58.8% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +5087.2% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +232.4% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +1544.3% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +94.4% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
12.703 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.1 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.067 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.16 g
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -99.2% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Saturated fat | 12.703g | 0.1g | 57% |
| Copper | 0.365mg | 41% | |
| Fats | 24.38g | 0.47g | 37% |
| Potassium | 1014mg | 30% | |
| Vitamin E | 4.3mg | 29% | |
| Iron | 0.68mg | 2.98mg | 29% |
| Vitamin C | 0.5mg | 21.9mg | 24% |
| Calories | 488kcal | 82kcal | 20% |
| Vitamin B3 | 3.076mg | 19% | |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.216mg | 17% | |
| Carbs | 62.85g | 18.91g | 15% |
| Manganese | 0.302mg | 13% | |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.153mg | 12% | |
| Phosphorus | 83mg | 12% | |
| Magnesium | 42mg | 10% | |
| Vitamin K | 11.4µg | 10% | |
| Selenium | 5.3µg | 10% | |
| Fiber | 1.9g | 4.1g | 9% |
| Vitamin A | 76µg | 8% | |
| Choline | 38.5mg | 7% | |
| Fructose | 5.85g | 7% | |
| Sodium | 189mg | 59mg | 6% |
| Zinc | 0.63mg | 6% | |
| Calcium | 90mg | 36mg | 5% |
| Protein | 6.86g | 4.32g | 5% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.06mg | 5% | |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.142mg | 3% | |
| Folate | 12µg | 3% | |
| Cholesterol | 9mg | 0mg | 3% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.16g | 1% | |
| Net carbs | 60.95g | 14.81g | N/A |
| Sugar | 46.54g | 12.18g | N/A |
| Starch | 0.22g | 0% | |
| Trans fat | 0.394g | 0g | N/A |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.067g | 0% | |
| Tryptophan | 0.031mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.133mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 0.089mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 0.124mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 0.134mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.027mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.13mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 0.088mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.071mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
0%
31%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
8%
49%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Tomato paste is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 9mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Tomato paste is lower in Sugar (difference - 34.36g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Tomato paste contains less Sodium (difference - 130mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Tomato paste is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 12.603g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Tomato paste is lower in glycemic index (difference - 6)
Which food is cheaper?
Tomato paste is cheaper (difference - $2)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Tomato paste is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Tomato paste is relatively richer in vitamins