Spanish rice vs. Pork skins — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
How are Spanish rice and Pork skins different?
- Spanish rice is richer in Manganese, Folate, and Vitamin K, while Pork skins are higher in Selenium, Choline, Vitamin B12, and Vitamin B2.
- Pork skins covers your daily need of Selenium 61% more than Spanish rice.
- Spanish rice is lower in Sodium.
Restaurant, Mexican, spanish rice and Snacks, pork skins, plain types were used in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +18.2% |
| Contains more IronIron | +30.7% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -71% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +465.2% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +50% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +44.6% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +16.7% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +49.1% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +454.1% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +150% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +13.2% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +84.8% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +53.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +256.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +400% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +282.4% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +700% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +1707.7% |
~equal in
Vitamin D
~0µg
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
3.28 g
Fats:
5.29 g
Carbs:
31.16 g
Water:
58.54 g
Other:
1.73 g
Protein:
61.3 g
Fats:
31.3 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
1.8 g
Other:
5.6 g
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +3152.2% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +1768.9% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +491.7% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +223.7% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated Fat:
Sat. Fat
1.005 g
Monounsaturated Fat:
Mono. Fat
1.511 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
2.317 g
Saturated Fat:
Sat. Fat
11.37 g
Monounsaturated Fat:
Mono. Fat
14.78 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
3.64 g
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated Fat | -91.2% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated Fat | +878.2% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +57.1% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Calories | 185kcal | 544kcal |
|
| Protein | 3.28g | 61.3g |
|
| Fats | 5.29g | 31.3g |
|
| Vitamin C | 0.1mg | 0.5mg |
|
| Net carbs | 29.96g | 0g |
|
| Carbs | 31.16g | 0g |
|
| Cholesterol | 0mg | 95mg |
|
| Magnesium | 13mg | 11mg |
|
| Calcium | 20mg | 30mg |
|
| Potassium | 116mg | 127mg |
|
| Iron | 1.15mg | 0.88mg |
|
| Sugar | 1.3g | 0g |
|
| Fiber | 1.2g | 0g |
|
| Copper | 0.065mg | 0.094mg |
|
| Zinc | 0.48mg | 0.56mg |
|
| Starch | 27.55g |
|
|
| Phosphorus | 57mg | 85mg |
|
| Sodium | 528mg | 1818mg |
|
| Vitamin A | 100IU | 40IU |
|
| Vitamin A | 6µg | 12µg |
|
| Vitamin E | 0.6mg | 0.53mg |
|
| Manganese | 0.39mg | 0.069mg |
|
| Selenium | 7.4µg | 41µg |
|
| Vitamin B1 | 0.183mg | 0.099mg |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.074mg | 0.283mg |
|
| Vitamin B3 | 2.378mg | 1.549mg |
|
| Vitamin B5 | 0.415mg | 0.43mg |
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.082mg | 0.023mg |
|
| Vitamin B12 | 0.08µg | 0.64µg |
|
| Vitamin K | 13µg | 0µg |
|
| Folate | 50µg | 0µg |
|
| Trans Fat | 0.07g |
|
|
| Choline | 9.1mg | 164.5mg |
|
| Saturated Fat | 1.005g | 11.37g |
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 1.511g | 14.78g |
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 2.317g | 3.64g |
|
| Tryptophan | 0.044mg | 0.118mg |
|
| Threonine | 0.098mg | 1.823mg |
|
| Isoleucine | 0.109mg | 1.382mg |
|
| Leucine | 0.24mg | 3.322mg |
|
| Lysine | 0.131mg | 2.783mg |
|
| Methionine | 0.071mg | 0.48mg |
|
| Phenylalanine | 153mg | 1.94mg |
|
| Valine | 0.137mg | 2.421mg |
|
| Histidine | 0.071mg | 0.725mg |
|
| Fructose | 0.42g |
|
|
| Omega-3 - ALA | 0.238g |
|
|
| Omega-6 - Gamma-linoleic acid | 0.011g |
|
|
| Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid | 0.002g |
|
|
| Omega-6 - Linoleic acid | 2.052g |
|
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
20%
26%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
29%
61%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Spanish rice is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 95mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Spanish rice contains less Sodium (difference - 1290mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Spanish rice is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 10.365g)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Pork skins is lower in Sugar (difference - 1.3g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Pork skins is lower in glycemic index (difference - 51)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Pork skins is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.