Sugar substitute vs. Chuck steak — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
How are sugar substitute and chuck steak different?
- Sugar substitute is higher in calcium; however, chuck steak is richer in zinc, iron, vitamin B6, phosphorus, vitamin B2, vitamin B5, potassium, and copper.
- Daily need coverage for calcium for sugar substitute is 86% higher.
- Sugar substitute contains 8 times more sodium than chuck steak. While sugar substitute contains 572mg of sodium, chuck steak contains only 71mg.
- Chuck steak has a lower glycemic index (0) than sugar substitute (40).
Sweeteners, sugar substitute, granulated, brown and Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled are the varieties used in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +5393.8% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +83.3% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +266.7% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +733.3% |
| Contains more IronIron | +1431.3% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +1000% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +21600% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +2312.5% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -87.6% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +340% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +1173.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +840% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +2386.7% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
2.06 g
Fats:
0 g
Carbs:
84.77 g
Water:
9.14 g
Other:
4.03 g
Protein:
24.98 g
Fats:
19.64 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
55.22 g
Other:
0.16 g
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +2418.8% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +1112.6% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +∞% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +504.2% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin B12 | 3.03µg | 126% | |
| Calcium | 879mg | 16mg | 86% |
| Zinc | 0.04mg | 8.68mg | 79% |
| Selenium | 27.5µg | 50% | |
| Protein | 2.06g | 24.98g | 46% |
| Saturated fat | 8.66g | 39% | |
| Fats | 0g | 19.64g | 30% |
| Vitamin B3 | 4.663mg | 29% | |
| Cholesterol | 87mg | 29% | |
| Iron | 0.16mg | 2.45mg | 29% |
| Carbs | 84.77g | 0g | 28% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.015mg | 0.373mg | 28% |
| Phosphorus | 8mg | 193mg | 26% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 9.457g | 24% | |
| Sodium | 572mg | 71mg | 22% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.015mg | 0.191mg | 14% |
| Choline | 79mg | 14% | |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.08mg | 0.752mg | 13% |
| Copper | 0.007mg | 0.077mg | 8% |
| Potassium | 39mg | 325mg | 8% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.81g | 5% | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.015mg | 0.066mg | 4% |
| Calories | 347kcal | 277kcal | 4% |
| Magnesium | 6mg | 22mg | 4% |
| Fiber | 0.6g | 0g | 2% |
| Folate | 6µg | 2% | |
| Vitamin D | 0.1µg | 1% | |
| Vitamin E | 0.1mg | 1% | |
| Vitamin A | 7µg | 1% | |
| Starch | 3.52g | 1% | |
| Vitamin K | 1.6µg | 1% | |
| Vitamin D | 5IU | 1% | |
| Net carbs | 84.17g | 0g | N/A |
| Sugar | 4.03g | 0g | N/A |
| Manganese | 0.022mg | 0.012mg | 0% |
| Trans fat | 1.287g | N/A | |
| Tryptophan | 0.281mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 1.099mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 1.062mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 2.009mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 2.184mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.709mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.951mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 1.129mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.809mg | 0% | |
| Omega-3 - EPA | 0.001g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - ALA | 0.041g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - DPA | 0.004g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid | 0.006g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Linoleic acid | 0.619g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
1%
55%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
36%
65%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Sugar substitute is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 87mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Sugar substitute is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 8.66g)
Which food is cheaper?
Sugar substitute is cheaper (difference - $2)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Chuck steak is lower in Sugar (difference - 4.03g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Chuck steak contains less Sodium (difference - 501mg)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Chuck steak is lower in glycemic index (difference - 40)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Chuck steak is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Chuck steak is relatively richer in vitamins