Foodstruct Nutrition Search | Diet Analysis | Food Comparison | Glycemic Index Chart | Insulin Index Chart | Blog | Subscribe | Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Foods
  3. Sweets
  4. Sugar substitute
  5. Compare
  6. Sugar substitute vs. Tomato paste

Sugar substitute vs. Tomato paste — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison

Compare

A recap on differences between sugar substitute and tomato paste

  • Sugar substitute is higher in calcium, yet tomato paste is higher in copper, iron, potassium, vitamin B6, fiber, manganese, phosphorus, and vitamin B2.
  • Sugar substitute covers your daily calcium needs 84% more than tomato paste.
  • Sugar substitute contains 10 times more sodium than tomato paste. While sugar substitute contains 572mg of sodium, tomato paste contains only 59mg.

Food varieties used in this article are Sweeteners, sugar substitute, granulated, brown and Tomato products, canned, paste, without salt added.

Infographic

Sugar substitute vs Tomato paste infographic
Infographic link

Mineral Comparison

Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 4.3% 264% 3.4% 6% 2.3% 1.1% 3.4% 75% 2.9% 0%
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 30% 11% 89% 112% 122% 17% 36% 7.7% 39% 29%
Contains more CalciumCalcium +2341.7%
Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium +600%
Contains more PotassiumPotassium +2500%
Contains more IronIron +1762.5%
Contains more CopperCopper +5114.3%
Contains more ZincZinc +1475%
Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus +937.5%
Contains less SodiumSodium -89.7%
Contains more ManganeseManganese +1272.7%

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 0% 0% 0% 0% 3.8% 3.5% 0% 4.8% 3.5% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 73% 25% 86% 0% 15% 35% 58% 8.5% 50% 0% 29% 9% 21%
Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 +300%
Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 +920%
Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 +77.5%
Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 +1340%
~equal in Vitamin D ~0µg
~equal in Vitamin B12 ~0µg

All nutrients comparison - raw data values

Nutrient Sugar substitute Tomato paste DV% diff.
Calcium 879mg 36mg 84%
Copper 0.007mg 0.365mg 40%
Iron 0.16mg 2.98mg 35%
Vitamin E 4.3mg 29%
Potassium 39mg 1014mg 29%
Vitamin C 21.9mg 24%
Sodium 572mg 59mg 22%
Carbs 84.77g 18.91g 22%
Vitamin B3 3.076mg 19%
Vitamin B6 0.015mg 0.216mg 15%
Fiber 0.6g 4.1g 14%
Calories 347kcal 82kcal 13%
Manganese 0.022mg 0.302mg 12%
Vitamin B2 0.015mg 0.153mg 11%
Phosphorus 8mg 83mg 11%
Selenium 5.3µg 10%
Vitamin K 11.4µg 10%
Magnesium 6mg 42mg 9%
Vitamin A 76µg 8%
Choline 38.5mg 7%
Fructose 0g 5.85g 7%
Protein 2.06g 4.32g 5%
Zinc 0.04mg 0.63mg 5%
Vitamin B1 0.015mg 0.06mg 4%
Folate 12µg 3%
Vitamin B5 0.08mg 0.142mg 1%
Starch 3.52g 0.22g 1%
Polyunsaturated fat 0.16g 1%
Fats 0g 0.47g 1%
Net carbs 84.17g 14.81g N/A
Sugar 4.03g 12.18g N/A
Saturated fat 0.1g 0%
Monounsaturated fat 0.067g 0%
Tryptophan 0.031mg 0%
Threonine 0.133mg 0%
Isoleucine 0.089mg 0%
Leucine 0.124mg 0%
Lysine 0.134mg 0%
Methionine 0.027mg 0%
Phenylalanine 0.13mg 0%
Valine 0.088mg 0%
Histidine 0.071mg 0%

Macronutrient Comparison

Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
2% 85% 9% 4%
Protein: 2.06 g
Fats: 0 g
Carbs: 84.77 g
Water: 9.14 g
Other: 4.03 g
4% 19% 74% 3%
Protein: 4.32 g
Fats: 0.47 g
Carbs: 18.91 g
Water: 73.5 g
Other: 2.8 g
Contains more CarbsCarbs +348.3%
Contains more OtherOther +43.9%
Contains more ProteinProtein +109.7%
Contains more FatsFats +∞%
Contains more WaterWater +704.2%

Carbohydrate type comparison

Carbohydrate type breakdown side-by-side comparison
47% 14% 39%
Starch: 3.52 g
Sucrose: 0 g
Glucose: 1.09 g
Fructose: 0 g
Lactose: 0 g
Maltose: 2.94 g
Galactose: 0 g
2% 2% 46% 47% 2%
Starch: 0.22 g
Sucrose: 0.3 g
Glucose: 5.75 g
Fructose: 5.85 g
Lactose: 0 g
Maltose: 0.28 g
Galactose: 0 g
Contains more StarchStarch +1500%
Contains more MaltoseMaltose +950%
Contains more SucroseSucrose +∞%
Contains more GlucoseGlucose +427.5%
Contains more FructoseFructose +∞%
~equal in Lactose ~0g
~equal in Galactose ~0g

People also compare

Sugar substitute
Sugar substitute vs Agave nectar
Agave nectar
Sugar substitute
Sugar substitute vs Amaranth
Amaranth
Sugar substitute
Sugar substitute vs Barley
Barley
Tomato paste
Tomato paste vs Tomato
Tomato
Tomato paste
Tomato paste vs Tomato juice
Tomato juice
Tomato paste
Tomato paste vs Tomato sauce
Tomato sauce

References

All the values for which the sources are not specified explicitly are taken from FDA’s Food Central. The exact link to the food presented on this page can be found below.

  1. Sugar substitute - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/170675/nutrients
  2. Tomato paste - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/170459/nutrients

All the Daily Values are presented for males aged 31-50, for 2000-calorie diets.

Data provided by FoodStruct.com should be considered and used as information only. Please consult your physician before beginning any diet.