Sugar substitute vs. Tomato paste — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
A recap on differences between sugar substitute and tomato paste
- Sugar substitute is higher in calcium, yet tomato paste is higher in copper, iron, potassium, vitamin B6, fiber, manganese, phosphorus, and vitamin B2.
- Sugar substitute covers your daily calcium needs 84% more than tomato paste.
- Sugar substitute contains 10 times more sodium than tomato paste. While sugar substitute contains 572mg of sodium, tomato paste contains only 59mg.
Food varieties used in this article are Sweeteners, sugar substitute, granulated, brown and Tomato products, canned, paste, without salt added.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +2341.7% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +600% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +2500% |
| Contains more IronIron | +1762.5% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +5114.3% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +1475% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +937.5% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -89.7% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +1272.7% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +300% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +920% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +77.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +1340% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
2.06 g
Fats:
0 g
Carbs:
84.77 g
Water:
9.14 g
Other:
4.03 g
Protein:
4.32 g
Fats:
0.47 g
Carbs:
18.91 g
Water:
73.5 g
Other:
2.8 g
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +348.3% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +43.9% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +109.7% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +∞% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +704.2% |
Carbohydrate type comparison
Carbohydrate type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Starch:
3.52 g
Sucrose:
0 g
Glucose:
1.09 g
Fructose:
0 g
Lactose:
0 g
Maltose:
2.94 g
Galactose:
0 g
Starch:
0.22 g
Sucrose:
0.3 g
Glucose:
5.75 g
Fructose:
5.85 g
Lactose:
0 g
Maltose:
0.28 g
Galactose:
0 g
| Contains more StarchStarch | +1500% |
| Contains more MaltoseMaltose | +950% |
| Contains more SucroseSucrose | +∞% |
| Contains more GlucoseGlucose | +427.5% |
| Contains more FructoseFructose | +∞% |
~equal in
Lactose
~0g
~equal in
Galactose
~0g
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Calcium | 879mg | 36mg | 84% |
| Copper | 0.007mg | 0.365mg | 40% |
| Iron | 0.16mg | 2.98mg | 35% |
| Vitamin E | 4.3mg | 29% | |
| Potassium | 39mg | 1014mg | 29% |
| Vitamin C | 21.9mg | 24% | |
| Sodium | 572mg | 59mg | 22% |
| Carbs | 84.77g | 18.91g | 22% |
| Vitamin B3 | 3.076mg | 19% | |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.015mg | 0.216mg | 15% |
| Fiber | 0.6g | 4.1g | 14% |
| Calories | 347kcal | 82kcal | 13% |
| Manganese | 0.022mg | 0.302mg | 12% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.015mg | 0.153mg | 11% |
| Phosphorus | 8mg | 83mg | 11% |
| Selenium | 5.3µg | 10% | |
| Vitamin K | 11.4µg | 10% | |
| Magnesium | 6mg | 42mg | 9% |
| Vitamin A | 76µg | 8% | |
| Choline | 38.5mg | 7% | |
| Fructose | 0g | 5.85g | 7% |
| Protein | 2.06g | 4.32g | 5% |
| Zinc | 0.04mg | 0.63mg | 5% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.015mg | 0.06mg | 4% |
| Folate | 12µg | 3% | |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.08mg | 0.142mg | 1% |
| Starch | 3.52g | 0.22g | 1% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.16g | 1% | |
| Fats | 0g | 0.47g | 1% |
| Net carbs | 84.17g | 14.81g | N/A |
| Sugar | 4.03g | 12.18g | N/A |
| Saturated fat | 0.1g | 0% | |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.067g | 0% | |
| Tryptophan | 0.031mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.133mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 0.089mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 0.124mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 0.134mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.027mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.13mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 0.088mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.071mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
1%
31%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
36%
49%
Comparison summary
Which food is richer in minerals?
Tomato paste is relatively richer in minerals
Which food contains less Sodium?
Tomato paste contains less Sodium (difference - 513mg)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Tomato paste is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Sugar substitute is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 0mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Sugar substitute is lower in Sugar (difference - 8.15g)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Sugar substitute is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 0.1g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Sugar substitute is lower in glycemic index (difference - 5)
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)