Crateva religiosa vs. Chuck steak — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
What are the differences between crateva religiosa and chuck steak?
- Crateva religiosa is higher in vitamin C, fiber, and manganese, yet chuck steak is higher in zinc, phosphorus, and iron.
- Chuck steak's daily need coverage for zinc is 76% more.
- The amount of sugar in chuck steak is lower.
We used Abiyuch, raw and Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled types in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -71.8% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +1416.7% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +100% |
| Contains more IronIron | +52.2% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +35.1% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +2700% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +310.6% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +40% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
1.5 g
Fats:
0.1 g
Carbs:
17.6 g
Water:
79.9 g
Other:
0.9 g
Protein:
24.98 g
Fats:
19.64 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
55.22 g
Other:
0.16 g
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +44.7% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +462.5% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +1565.3% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +19540% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.014 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
8.66 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
9.457 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.81 g
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -99.8% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin B12 | 3.03µg | 126% | |
| Zinc | 0.31mg | 8.68mg | 76% |
| Vitamin C | 54.1mg | 0mg | 60% |
| Selenium | 27.5µg | 50% | |
| Protein | 1.5g | 24.98g | 47% |
| Saturated fat | 0.014g | 8.66g | 39% |
| Fats | 0.1g | 19.64g | 30% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.373mg | 29% | |
| Vitamin B3 | 4.663mg | 29% | |
| Cholesterol | 87mg | 29% | |
| Monounsaturated fat | 9.457g | 24% | |
| Fiber | 5.3g | 0g | 21% |
| Phosphorus | 47mg | 193mg | 21% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.752mg | 15% | |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.191mg | 15% | |
| Choline | 79mg | 14% | |
| Iron | 1.61mg | 2.45mg | 11% |
| Calories | 69kcal | 277kcal | 10% |
| Manganese | 0.182mg | 0.012mg | 7% |
| Carbs | 17.6g | 0g | 6% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.066mg | 6% | |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.81g | 5% | |
| Fructose | 3.8g | 5% | |
| Folate | 6µg | 2% | |
| Sodium | 20mg | 71mg | 2% |
| Copper | 0.057mg | 0.077mg | 2% |
| Vitamin E | 0.1mg | 1% | |
| Vitamin D | 5IU | 1% | |
| Potassium | 304mg | 325mg | 1% |
| Vitamin K | 1.6µg | 1% | |
| Calcium | 8mg | 16mg | 1% |
| Vitamin D | 0.1µg | 1% | |
| Net carbs | 12.3g | 0g | N/A |
| Magnesium | 24mg | 22mg | 0% |
| Sugar | 8.55g | 0g | N/A |
| Vitamin A | 5µg | 7µg | 0% |
| Trans fat | 0g | 1.287g | N/A |
| Tryptophan | 0.281mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 1.099mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 1.062mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 2.009mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 2.184mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.709mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.951mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 1.129mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.809mg | 0% | |
| Omega-3 - EPA | 0.001g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - ALA | 0.041g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - DPA | 0.004g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid | 0.006g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Linoleic acid | 0.619g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
14%
55%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
18%
65%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Crateva religiosa is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 87mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Crateva religiosa contains less Sodium (difference - 51mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Crateva religiosa is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 8.646g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Crateva religiosa is lower in glycemic index (difference - 0)
Which food is cheaper?
Crateva religiosa is cheaper (difference - $2)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Chuck steak is lower in Sugar (difference - 8.55g)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Chuck steak is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Chuck steak is relatively richer in vitamins