Allspice vs. Cheesecake — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
How are allspice and cheesecake different?
- Allspice is higher than cheesecake in manganese, fiber, iron, calcium, copper, vitamin C, magnesium, and potassium.
- Allspice covers your daily need for manganese, 122% more than cheesecake.
- Allspice contains 98 times more vitamin C than cheesecake. Allspice contains 39.2mg of vitamin C, while cheesecake contains 0.4mg.
- Allspice is lower in saturated fat.
- Cheesecake has a higher glycemic index (50) than allspice (15).
Spices, allspice, ground and Cheesecake commercially prepared types were used in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +1127.3% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +1196.1% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +1060% |
| Contains more IronIron | +1020.6% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +2665% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +98% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +21.5% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -82.4% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +2002.1% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +92.6% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +9700% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +260.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +1366.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +303.8% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +100% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +488.9% |
| Contains more Vitamin DVitamin D | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +206.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
6.09 g
Fats:
8.69 g
Carbs:
72.12 g
Water:
8.46 g
Other:
4.64 g
Protein:
5.5 g
Fats:
22.5 g
Carbs:
25.5 g
Water:
45.6 g
Other:
0.9 g
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +182.8% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +415.6% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +158.9% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +439% |
~equal in
Protein
~5.5g
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
2.55 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.66 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
2.36 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
9.921 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
8.634 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
1.602 g
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -74.3% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +47.3% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +1208.2% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Manganese | 2.943mg | 0.14mg | 122% |
| Fiber | 21.6g | 0.4g | 85% |
| Iron | 7.06mg | 0.63mg | 80% |
| Calcium | 661mg | 51mg | 61% |
| Copper | 0.553mg | 0.02mg | 59% |
| Vitamin C | 39.2mg | 0.4mg | 43% |
| Saturated fat | 2.55g | 9.921g | 34% |
| Magnesium | 135mg | 11mg | 30% |
| Potassium | 1044mg | 90mg | 28% |
| Fats | 8.69g | 22.5g | 21% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.66g | 8.634g | 20% |
| Cholesterol | 0mg | 55mg | 18% |
| Vitamin B3 | 2.86mg | 0.195mg | 17% |
| Sodium | 77mg | 438mg | 16% |
| Carbs | 72.12g | 25.5g | 16% |
| Vitamin A | 27µg | 159µg | 15% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.21mg | 0.052mg | 12% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.571mg | 11% | |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.063mg | 0.193mg | 10% |
| Choline | 45.9mg | 8% | |
| Vitamin B12 | 0µg | 0.17µg | 7% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.101mg | 0.028mg | 6% |
| Zinc | 1.01mg | 0.51mg | 5% |
| Folate | 36µg | 18µg | 5% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 2.36g | 1.602g | 5% |
| Selenium | 2.7µg | 5.2µg | 5% |
| Vitamin E | 0.56mg | 4% | |
| Vitamin K | 4.4µg | 4% | |
| Calories | 263kcal | 321kcal | 3% |
| Vitamin D | 0µg | 0.5µg | 3% |
| Phosphorus | 113mg | 93mg | 3% |
| Vitamin D | 0IU | 18IU | 2% |
| Protein | 6.09g | 5.5g | 1% |
| Net carbs | 50.52g | 25.1g | N/A |
| Sugar | 21.8g | N/A | |
| Tryptophan | 0.064mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.222mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 0.281mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 0.464mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 0.372mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.136mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.258mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 0.314mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.133mg | 0% | |
| Omega-3 - DHA | 0g | 0.005g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
24%
19%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
132%
22%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Allspice is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 55mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Allspice is lower in Sugar (difference - 21.8g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Allspice contains less Sodium (difference - 361mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Allspice is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 7.371g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Allspice is lower in glycemic index (difference - 35)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Allspice is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.