Beef sticks vs. Beef Stroganoff — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
What are the differences between Beef sticks and Beef Stroganoff?
- Beef sticks are higher in Iron, Vitamin B12, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B2, Phosphorus, and Zinc, yet Beef Stroganoff is higher in Folate.
- Beef sticks' daily need coverage for Saturated Fat is 92% more.
- Beef sticks have 45 times more Vitamin B3 than Beef Stroganoff. While Beef sticks have 4.54mg of Vitamin B3, Beef Stroganoff has only 0.1mg.
- The amount of Saturated Fat in Beef Stroganoff is lower.
We used Snacks, beef sticks, smoked and Soup, beef stroganoff, canned, chunky style, ready-to-serve types in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Contains
more
Calcium
+240%
Contains
more
Iron
+286.4%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+950%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+260%
Contains
more
Potassium
+83.6%
Contains
more
Zinc
+120%
Contains
more
Copper
+30%
Contains
less
Sodium
-71.6%
Contains
more
Calcium
+240%
Contains
more
Iron
+286.4%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+950%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+260%
Contains
more
Potassium
+83.6%
Contains
more
Zinc
+120%
Contains
more
Copper
+30%
Contains
less
Sodium
-71.6%
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
:
Contains
more
Vitamin C
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+252.5%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+384.4%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+4440%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+241.7%
Contains
more
Vitamin B12
+284.6%
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+228%
Contains
more
Folate
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin C
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+252.5%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+384.4%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+4440%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+241.7%
Contains
more
Vitamin B12
+284.6%
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+228%
Contains
more
Folate
+∞%
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Contains
more
Protein
+321.6%
Contains
more
Fats
+978.3%
Contains
more
Other
+214.3%
Contains
more
Carbs
+66.7%
Contains
more
Water
+318.3%
Protein:
21.5 g
Fats:
49.6 g
Carbs:
5.4 g
Water:
19.1 g
Other:
4.4 g
Protein:
5.1 g
Fats:
4.6 g
Carbs:
9 g
Water:
79.9 g
Other:
1.4 g
Contains
more
Protein
+321.6%
Contains
more
Fats
+978.3%
Contains
more
Other
+214.3%
Contains
more
Carbs
+66.7%
Contains
more
Water
+318.3%
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Contains
more
Monounsaturated Fat
+1215.6%
Contains
more
Polyunsaturated fat
+1696.7%
Contains
less
Saturated Fat
-88.8%
Saturated Fat:
20.8 g
Monounsaturated Fat:
20.47 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
4.42 g
Saturated Fat:
2.324 g
Monounsaturated Fat:
1.556 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
0.246 g
Contains
more
Monounsaturated Fat
+1215.6%
Contains
more
Polyunsaturated fat
+1696.7%
Contains
less
Saturated Fat
-88.8%
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Net carbs | 5.4g | 8.4g |
|
| Protein | 21.5g | 5.1g |
|
| Fats | 49.6g | 4.6g |
|
| Carbs | 5.4g | 9g |
|
| Calories | 550kcal | 98kcal |
|
| Sugar | 1.68g |
|
|
| Fiber | 0.6g |
|
|
| Calcium | 68mg | 20mg |
|
| Iron | 3.4mg | 0.88mg |
|
| Magnesium | 21mg | 2mg |
|
| Phosphorus | 180mg | 50mg |
|
| Potassium | 257mg | 140mg |
|
| Sodium | 1531mg | 435mg |
|
| Zinc | 2.42mg | 1.1mg |
|
| Copper | 0.13mg | 0.1mg |
|
| Manganese | 0.086mg |
|
|
| Selenium | 7.6µg |
|
|
| Vitamin A | 250IU | 820IU |
|
| Vitamin A RAE | 13µg | 84µg |
|
| Vitamin E | 0.41mg |
|
|
| Vitamin C | 6.8mg | 0mg |
|
| Vitamin B1 | 0.141mg | 0.04mg |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.436mg | 0.09mg |
|
| Vitamin B3 | 4.54mg | 0.1mg |
|
| Vitamin B5 | 0.328mg |
|
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.205mg | 0.06mg |
|
| Folate | 0µg | 67µg |
|
| Vitamin B12 | 1µg | 0.26µg |
|
| Vitamin K | 102.8µg |
|
|
| Tryptophan | 0.184mg |
|
|
| Threonine | 0.832mg |
|
|
| Isoleucine | 0.818mg |
|
|
| Leucine | 1.473mg |
|
|
| Lysine | 1.518mg |
|
|
| Methionine | 0.454mg |
|
|
| Phenylalanine | 0.801mg |
|
|
| Valine | 0.95mg |
|
|
| Histidine | 0.53mg |
|
|
| Cholesterol | 133mg | 21mg |
|
| Saturated Fat | 20.8g | 2.324g |
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 20.47g | 1.556g |
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 4.42g | 0.246g |
|
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
38%
37%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
58%
24%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Beef sticks is lower in Sugar (difference - 1.68g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Beef sticks is lower in glycemic index (difference - 53)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Beef sticks is relatively richer in minerals
Which food contains less Sodium?
Beef Stroganoff contains less Sodium (difference - 1096mg)
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Beef Stroganoff is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 112mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Beef Stroganoff is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 18.476g)
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.