Bockwurst vs. Flank steak — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
The main differences between Bockwurst and Flank steak
- Bockwurst is richer in Vitamin K, and Vitamin B1, yet Flank steak is richer in Selenium, Vitamin B12, Zinc, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B3, and Choline.
- Daily need coverage for Vitamin K from Bockwurst is 57% higher.
- Bockwurst contains 14 times more Sodium than Flank steak. Bockwurst contains 756mg of Sodium, while Flank steak contains 56mg.
Food types used in this article are Bockwurst, pork, veal, raw and Beef, flank, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +13% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +105% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +22% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +1800% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +25.6% |
| Contains more IronIron | +51.3% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +136.7% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +24.3% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -92.6% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +160.2% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +157.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +75.2% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +63.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +4914.3% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +88.9% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +31.1% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +53.2% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +89.5% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +127.2% |
~equal in
Vitamin D
~µg
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
14.03 g
Fats:
25.87 g
Carbs:
2.95 g
Water:
54.47 g
Other:
2.68 g
Protein:
27.66 g
Fats:
8.23 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
64.17 g
Other:
0 g
| Contains more FatsFats | +214.3% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +-4566.7% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +97.1% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +17.8% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated Fat:
Sat. Fat
10.256 g
Monounsaturated Fat:
Mono. Fat
13.138 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
2.328 g
Saturated Fat:
Sat. Fat
3.395 g
Monounsaturated Fat:
Mono. Fat
3.317 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.322 g
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated Fat | +296.1% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +623% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated Fat | -66.9% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
| Rich in minerals | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Calories | 301kcal | 192kcal |
|
| Protein | 14.03g | 27.66g |
|
| Fats | 25.87g | 8.23g |
|
| Vitamin C | 3.2mg | 0mg |
|
| Net carbs | 1.95g | 0g |
|
| Carbs | 2.95g | 0g |
|
| Cholesterol | 93mg | 79mg |
|
| Magnesium | 26mg | 23mg |
|
| Calcium | 41mg | 20mg |
|
| Potassium | 270mg | 339mg |
|
| Iron | 1.15mg | 1.74mg |
|
| Sugar | 1.33g | 0g |
|
| Fiber | 1g | 0g |
|
| Copper | 0.1mg | 0.082mg |
|
| Zinc | 2.07mg | 4.9mg |
|
| Phosphorus | 169mg | 210mg |
|
| Sodium | 756mg | 56mg |
|
| Vitamin A | 256IU | 0IU |
|
| Vitamin A | 15µg | 0µg |
|
| Vitamin E | 0.38mg | 0.38mg | |
| Manganese | 0.171mg | 0.009mg |
|
| Selenium | 11.3µg | 29.4µg |
|
| Vitamin B1 | 0.193mg | 0.075mg |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.233mg | 0.133mg |
|
| Vitamin B3 | 5.616mg | 7.363mg |
|
| Vitamin B5 | 0.891mg | 0.545mg |
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.378mg | 0.579mg |
|
| Vitamin B12 | 0.86µg | 1.63µg |
|
| Vitamin K | 70.2µg | 1.4µg |
|
| Folate | 17µg | 9µg |
|
| Choline | 46.4mg | 105.4mg |
|
| Saturated Fat | 10.256g | 3.395g |
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 13.138g | 3.317g |
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 2.328g | 0.322g |
|
| Tryptophan | 153mg | 0.182mg |
|
| Threonine | 0.613mg | 1.105mg |
|
| Isoleucine | 0.677mg | 1.259mg |
|
| Leucine | 1.107mg | 2.201mg |
|
| Lysine | 1.166mg | 2.338mg |
|
| Methionine | 0.333mg | 0.72mg |
|
| Phenylalanine | 0.556mg | 1.093mg |
|
| Valine | 0.767mg | 1.372mg |
|
| Histidine | 0.513mg | 0.883mg |
|
| Fructose | 0.01g |
|
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
54%
49%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
44%
54%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Flank steak is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 14mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Flank steak is lower in Sugar (difference - 1.33g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Flank steak contains less Sodium (difference - 700mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Flank steak is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 6.861g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Flank steak is lower in glycemic index (difference - 28)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Bockwurst is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)
Which food is richer in minerals?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.