Bologna sausage vs Chuck steak - In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Significant differences between Bologna sausage and Chuck steak
- Bologna sausage is richer in Vitamin B1, and Vitamin D, while Chuck steak is higher in Vitamin B12, Zinc, Selenium, Iron, and Vitamin B6.
- Chuck steak covers your daily Vitamin B12 needs 88% more than Bologna sausage.
- Bologna sausage has 13 times more Sodium than Chuck steak. Bologna sausage has 907mg of Sodium, while Chuck steak has 71mg.
Specific food types used in this comparison are Bologna, pork and Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" chart below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
Contains
more
Calcium
+45.5%
Contains
more
Iron
+218.2%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+57.1%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+38.8%
Contains
more
Potassium
+15.7%
Contains
less
Sodium
-92.2%
Contains
more
Zinc
+327.6%
Equal in Copper - 0.077
Contains
more
Calcium
+45.5%
Contains
more
Iron
+218.2%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+57.1%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+38.8%
Contains
more
Potassium
+15.7%
Contains
less
Sodium
-92.2%
Contains
more
Zinc
+327.6%
Equal in Copper - 0.077
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" chart below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
:
Contains
more
Vitamin E
+160%
Contains
more
Vitamin D
+1300%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+692.4%
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+21.7%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+19.6%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+38.1%
Contains
more
Folate
+20%
Contains
more
Vitamin B12
+225.8%
Contains
more
Vitamin K
+433.3%
Equal in Vitamin B5 - 0.752
Contains
more
Vitamin E
+160%
Contains
more
Vitamin D
+1300%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+692.4%
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+21.7%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+19.6%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+38.1%
Contains
more
Folate
+20%
Contains
more
Vitamin B12
+225.8%
Contains
more
Vitamin K
+433.3%
Equal in Vitamin B5 - 0.752
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the most right column. It shows the amounts side by side, making it easier to realize the amount of difference.
 |
 |
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar | Equal | ||
| Lower in glycemic index | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Net carbs | 0.73g | 0g |
|
| Protein | 15.3g | 24.98g |
|
| Fats | 19.87g | 19.64g |
|
| Carbs | 0.73g | 0g |
|
| Calories | 247kcal | 277kcal |
|
| Starch | g | g | |
| Fructose | g | g | |
| Sugar | 0g | 0g | |
| Fiber | 0g | 0g | |
| Calcium | 11mg | 16mg |
|
| Iron | 0.77mg | 2.45mg |
|
| Magnesium | 14mg | 22mg |
|
| Phosphorus | 139mg | 193mg |
|
| Potassium | 281mg | 325mg |
|
| Sodium | 907mg | 71mg |
|
| Zinc | 2.03mg | 8.68mg |
|
| Copper | 0.08mg | 0.077mg |
|
| Vitamin A | 0IU | 25IU |
|
| Vitamin E | 0.26mg | 0.1mg |
|
| Vitamin D | 56IU | 5IU |
|
| Vitamin D | 1.4µg | 0.1µg |
|
| Vitamin C | 0mg | 0mg | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.523mg | 0.066mg |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.157mg | 0.191mg |
|
| Vitamin B3 | 3.9mg | 4.663mg |
|
| Vitamin B5 | 0.72mg | 0.752mg |
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.27mg | 0.373mg |
|
| Folate | 5µg | 6µg |
|
| Vitamin B12 | 0.93µg | 3.03µg |
|
| Vitamin K | 0.3µg | 1.6µg |
|
| Tryptophan | 0.149mg | 0.281mg |
|
| Threonine | 0.641mg | 1.099mg |
|
| Isoleucine | 0.663mg | 1.062mg |
|
| Leucine | 1.168mg | 2.009mg |
|
| Lysine | 1.204mg | 2.184mg |
|
| Methionine | 0.412mg | 0.709mg |
|
| Phenylalanine | 0.585mg | 0.951mg |
|
| Valine | 0.737mg | 1.129mg |
|
| Histidine | 0.482mg | 0.809mg |
|
| Cholesterol | 59mg | 87mg |
|
| Trans Fat | g | 1.287g |
|
| Saturated Fat | 6.839g | 8.66g |
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 9.732g | 9.457g |
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 2.107g | 0.81g |
|
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low glycemic index diet | Equal | |
People also compare
Vitamin and Mineral Summary Scores
The summary score is calculated by summing up the daily values contained in 300 grams of the product. Obviously the more the food fulfills human daily needs, the more the summary score is.
Vitamin Summary Score
43
56
Mineral Summary Score
41
62
Macronutrients Comparison
Macronutrient comparison charts compare the amount of protein, total fats, and total carbohydrates in 300 grams of the food. The displayed values show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of food.
Protein
92%
150%
Carbohydrates
1%
0%
Fats
92%
91%
Comparison summary
Which food is richer in minerals?
Chuck steak is relatively richer in minerals
Which food contains less Sodium?
Chuck steak contains less Sodium (difference - 836mg)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Chuck steak is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Bologna sausage is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 28mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Bologna sausage is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 1.821g)
Which food is cheaper?
Bologna sausage is cheaper (difference - $2)
Which food contains less Sugar?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Sugar (0 g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
?
The foods have equal glycemic indexes (0)