Chipotle salsa vs. Beef consomme — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison

Compare

The main differences between chipotle salsa and beef consomme

Chipotle salsa is richer than beef consomme in fiber.
Daily need coverage for fiber for chipotle salsa is 12% higher.
Chipotle salsa contains 8 times more sugar than beef consomme. Chipotle salsa contains 6.25g of sugar, while beef consomme contains 0.81g.

Food types used in this article are PACE, Chipotle Chunky Salsa and CAMPBELL'S Red and White, Beef Consomme, condensed.

Infographic

Infographic link

Mineral Comparison

Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.

Chipotle salsa

Beef consomme

~equal in Magnesium ~mg

~equal in Calcium ~0mg

~equal in Iron ~0mg

~equal in Copper ~mg

~equal in Zinc ~mg

~equal in Phosphorus ~mg

~equal in Sodium ~653mg

~equal in Manganese ~mg

~equal in Selenium ~µg

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.

Chipotle salsa

Beef consomme

~equal in Vitamin C ~mg

~equal in Vitamin A ~µg

~equal in Vitamin E ~mg

~equal in Vitamin D ~µg

~equal in Vitamin B1 ~mg

~equal in Vitamin B2 ~mg

~equal in Vitamin B3 ~mg

~equal in Vitamin B5 ~mg

~equal in Vitamin B6 ~mg

~equal in Vitamin B12 ~µg

~equal in Vitamin K ~µg

~equal in Folate ~µg

~equal in Choline ~mg

All nutrients comparison - raw data values

Nutrient			DV% diff.
Fiber	3.1g	0g	12%
Protein	0g	3.23g	6%
Sodium	719mg	653mg	3%
Carbs	6.25g	0.81g	2%
Potassium		32mg	1%
Calories	25kcal	16kcal	0%
Net carbs	3.15g	0.81g	N/A
Sugar	6.25g	0.81g	N/A