Chipotle salsa vs. Beef consomme — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
The main differences between chipotle salsa and beef consomme
- Chipotle salsa is richer in fiber, yet beef consomme is richer in protein.
- Daily need coverage for fiber for chipotle salsa is 12% higher.
- Chipotle salsa contains 8 times more carbs than beef consomme. Chipotle salsa contains 6.25g of carbs, while beef consomme contains 0.81g.
- Beef consomme contains less sugar.
Food types used in this article are PACE, Chipotle Chunky Salsa and CAMPBELL'S Red and White, Beef Consomme, condensed.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
The mineral comparison score is based on which food has a more favorable amount of each mineral. The �coverage� charts below show how much of the daily mineral needs are covered by the selected amount of each food.
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +∞% |
Vitamin Comparison
The vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins in which one food is richer than the other. The �coverage� charts below show how much of the daily vitamin needs are covered by the selected amount of each food.
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | ![]() |
![]() |
DV% diff. |
| Fiber | 3.1g | 0g | 12% |
| Protein | 0g | 3.23g | 6% |
| Sodium | 719mg | 653mg | 3% |
| Carbs | 6.25g | 0.81g | 2% |
| Potassium | 32mg | 1% | |
| Calories | 25kcal | 16kcal | 0% |
| Protein per 100 calories | 0g | 20g | N/A |
| Calories per 10 g protein | 50kcal | N/A | |
| Weight per 100 calories | 400g | 625g | N/A |
| Net carbs | 3.15g | 0.81g | N/A |
| Sugar | 6.25g | 0.81g | N/A |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
0 g
Fats:
0 g
Carbs:
6.25 g
Water:
88.6 g
Other:
5.15 g
Protein:
3.23 g
Fats:
0 g
Carbs:
0.81 g
Water:
93.5 g
Other:
2.46 g
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +671.6% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +∞% |
~equal in
Fats
~0g
~equal in
Water
~93.5g






