Chuck steak vs. Kielbasa — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
The main differences between Chuck steak and Kielbasa
- Chuck steak has more Iron, and Monounsaturated Fat, however, Kielbasa has more Vitamin C, and Polyunsaturated fat.
- Daily need coverage for Sodium from Kielbasa is 49% higher.
- Kielbasa has 2 times less Iron than Chuck steak. Chuck steak has 2.45mg of Iron, while Kielbasa has 1.24mg.
- Kielbasa is lower in Saturated Fat.
Food types used in this article are Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled and Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked.
Fat Type Comparison
Comparison summary table
|Lower in Cholesterol|
|Lower in Saturated Fat|
|Lower in price|
|Lower in Sodium|
|Lower in Glycemic Index|
|Rich in minerals|
|Rich in vitamins|
|Lower in Sugar||Equal|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
|Vitamin A RAE||7µg||0µg|
|Omega-3 - EPA||0.001g|
|Omega-3 - DPA||0.004g|
|Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid||0.006g|
|Omega-6 - Linoleic acid||0.619g|
|Omega-3 - ALA||0.041g|
Which food is preferable for your diet?
|Low Fats diet|
|Low Carbs diet|
|Low Calories diet|
|Low Glycemic Index diet|