Fontina vs. Cherimoya — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Important differences between fontina and cherimoya
- Fontina has more vitamin B12, calcium, phosphorus, zinc, and vitamin A; however, cherimoya is richer in vitamin C and vitamin B6.
- Fontina's daily need coverage for saturated fat is 95% more.
- Cherimoya contains less cholesterol.
- Cherimoya has a higher glycemic index. The glycemic index of cherimoya is 59, while the glycemic index of fontina is 27.
The food varieties used in the comparison are Cheese, fontina and Cherimoya, raw.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +5400% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +2087.5% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +1230.8% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +∞% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +21.4% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +348.4% |
| Contains more IronIron | +17.4% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +176% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -99.1% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +564.3% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin DVitamin D | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +55.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +24.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +∞% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +381% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +329.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +209.6% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +283.3% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +1530.6% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +4479.4% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +483.1% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +1042.6% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +109.4% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +15694.5% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +779.8% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -98.8% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Saturated fat | 19.196g | 0.233g | 86% |
| Vitamin B12 | 1.68µg | 0µg | 70% |
| Calcium | 550mg | 10mg | 54% |
| Protein | 25.6g | 1.57g | 48% |
| Fats | 31.14g | 0.68g | 47% |
| Phosphorus | 346mg | 26mg | 46% |
| Cholesterol | 116mg | 0mg | 39% |
| Sodium | 800mg | 7mg | 34% |
| Zinc | 3.5mg | 0.16mg | 30% |
| Vitamin A | 261µg | 0µg | 29% |
| Selenium | 14.5µg | 26% | |
| Monounsaturated fat | 8.687g | 0.055g | 22% |
| Calories | 389kcal | 75kcal | 16% |
| Vitamin C | 0mg | 12.6mg | 14% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.083mg | 0.257mg | 13% |
| Fiber | 0g | 3g | 12% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 1.654g | 0.188g | 10% |
| Fructose | 6.28g | 8% | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.021mg | 0.101mg | 7% |
| Potassium | 64mg | 287mg | 7% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.204mg | 0.131mg | 6% |
| Copper | 0.025mg | 0.069mg | 5% |
| Carbs | 1.55g | 17.71g | 5% |
| Folate | 6µg | 23µg | 4% |
| Vitamin D | 23IU | 3% | |
| Manganese | 0.014mg | 0.093mg | 3% |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.15mg | 0.644mg | 3% |
| Choline | 15.4mg | 3% | |
| Vitamin D | 0.6µg | 3% | |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.429mg | 0.345mg | 2% |
| Vitamin K | 2.6µg | 2% | |
| Iron | 0.23mg | 0.27mg | 1% |
| Magnesium | 14mg | 17mg | 1% |
| Net carbs | 1.55g | 14.71g | N/A |
| Sugar | 1.55g | 12.87g | N/A |
| Vitamin E | 0.27mg | 0.27mg | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.361mg | 0.031mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 0.935mg | 0.052mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 1.384mg | 0.042mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 2.664mg | 0.063mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 2.328mg | 0.042mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0.706mg | 0.021mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 1.497mg | 0.042mg | 0% |
| Valine | 1.926mg | 0.063mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0.959mg | 0.021mg | 0% |
| Omega-3 - ALA | 0.159g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Linoleic acid | 0.028g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
33%
16%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
63%
10%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Fontina is lower in Sugar (difference - 11.32g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Fontina is lower in glycemic index (difference - 32)
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Cherimoya is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 116mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Cherimoya contains less Sodium (difference - 793mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Cherimoya is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 18.963g)
Which food is cheaper?
Cherimoya is cheaper (difference - $0.5)
Which food is richer in minerals?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.