Hamburger vs. Custard — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Significant differences between hamburgers and custard
- Hamburgers are richer than custard in vitamin B12, vitamin B3, iron, zinc, vitamin B1, folate, vitamin B6, and manganese.
- Hamburgers cover your daily vitamin B12 needs 38% more than custard.
- Hamburgers have 41 times more vitamin B3 than custard. Hamburgers have 5.365mg of vitamin B3, while custard has 0.132mg.
- Custard is lower in sodium.
- Hamburgers have a higher glycemic index (66) than custard (35).
Specific food types used in this comparison are Fast foods, hamburger; double, regular, patty; plain and Egg custards, dry mix, prepared with whole milk.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +25% |
| Contains more IronIron | +747.1% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +203.3% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +462.7% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +3000% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +36.3% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -79.7% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +255.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +13.6% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +3964.4% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +217.2% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +176.9% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +522.2% |
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +125.5% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +328.1% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +259% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +36.9% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +86.5% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +72.1% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +387.6% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +21.8% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -60.1% |
Carbohydrate type comparison
Carbohydrate type breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more SucroseSucrose | +∞% |
| Contains more GlucoseGlucose | +∞% |
| Contains more FructoseFructose | +∞% |
| Contains more MaltoseMaltose | +∞% |
| Contains more LactoseLactose | +3461.5% |
~equal in
Starch
~0g
~equal in
Galactose
~0g
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin B12 | 1.44µg | 0.52µg | 38% |
| Vitamin B3 | 5.365mg | 0.132mg | 33% |
| Iron | 2.88mg | 0.34mg | 32% |
| Protein | 17.08g | 3.99g | 26% |
| Zinc | 2.87mg | 0.51mg | 21% |
| Fats | 14.36g | 4g | 16% |
| Saturated fat | 5.096g | 2.032g | 14% |
| Sodium | 414mg | 84mg | 14% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.217mg | 0.061mg | 13% |
| Folate | 56µg | 9µg | 12% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 5.495g | 1.127g | 11% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.203mg | 0.064mg | 11% |
| Selenium | 6µg | 11% | |
| Manganese | 0.217mg | 0.007mg | 9% |
| Calories | 295kcal | 122kcal | 9% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.31mg | 0.699mg | 8% |
| Copper | 0.091mg | 0.03mg | 7% |
| Vitamin D | 47IU | 6% | |
| Vitamin A | 0µg | 52µg | 6% |
| Vitamin D | 1.2µg | 6% | |
| Fiber | 0.9g | 0g | 4% |
| Calcium | 102mg | 139mg | 4% |
| Fructose | 2.03g | 0g | 3% |
| Choline | 11.8mg | 2% | |
| Carbs | 24.1g | 17.6g | 2% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.25mg | 0.22mg | 2% |
| Phosphorus | 136mg | 130mg | 1% |
| Magnesium | 20mg | 16mg | 1% |
| Cholesterol | 47mg | 51mg | 1% |
| Potassium | 226mg | 207mg | 1% |
| Vitamin C | 0mg | 0.1mg | 0% |
| Net carbs | 23.2g | 17.6g | N/A |
| Sugar | 4.15g | 4.82g | N/A |
| Vitamin E | 0.06mg | 0% | |
| Vitamin K | 0.2µg | 0% | |
| Trans fat | 0.814g | N/A | |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.38g | 0.312g | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.206mg | 0.082mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 0.666mg | 0.192mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 0.716mg | 0.207mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 1.319mg | 0.337mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 1.226mg | 0.214mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0.37mg | 0.091mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 0.677mg | 0.173mg | 0% |
| Valine | 0.823mg | 0.233mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0.505mg | 0.092mg | 0% |
| Omega-3 - DHA | 0.003g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
38%
19%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
42%
21%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Hamburger is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 4mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Hamburger is lower in Sugar (difference - 0.67g)
Which food is cheaper?
Hamburger is cheaper (difference - $1.5)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Hamburger is relatively richer in minerals
Which food contains less Sodium?
Custard contains less Sodium (difference - 330mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Custard is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 3.064g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Custard is lower in glycemic index (difference - 31)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.