Hot sauce vs. Poppy seed dressing — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Important differences between Hot sauce and Poppy seed dressing
- Hot sauce has more Vitamin C, and Vitamin B6, however, Poppy seed dressing has more Vitamin K, Vitamin E, Phosphorus, Calcium, and Monounsaturated Fat.
- Hot sauce's daily need coverage for Vitamin C is 83% more.
- Hot sauce has 7 times more Vitamin B6 than Poppy seed dressing. Hot sauce has 0.157mg of Vitamin B6, while Poppy seed dressing has 0.022mg.
- Poppy seed dressing is lower in Sodium.
The food varieties used in the comparison are Sauce, ready-to-serve, pepper or hot and Salad dressing, poppyseed, creamy.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +136.1% |
| Contains more IronIron | +92% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +80% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +637.5% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +25% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +127.3% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +345.5% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -64.7% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +167.3% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +∞% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +24833.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +50% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +41.4% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +440.4% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +613.6% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +100% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +11.1% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +1866.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +1991.7% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
0.51 g
Fats:
0.37 g
Carbs:
1.75 g
Water:
89.98 g
Other:
7.39 g
Protein:
0.92 g
Fats:
33.33 g
Carbs:
23.73 g
Water:
38.85 g
Other:
3.17 g
| Contains more WaterWater | +131.6% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +133.1% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +80.4% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +8908.1% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +1256% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated Fat:
Sat. Fat
0.052 g
Monounsaturated Fat:
Mono. Fat
0.03 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.196 g
Saturated Fat:
Sat. Fat
6.061 g
Monounsaturated Fat:
Mono. Fat
8.207 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
17.326 g
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated Fat | -99.1% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated Fat | +27256.7% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +8739.8% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index | Equal | ||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Calories | 11kcal | 399kcal |
|
| Protein | 0.51g | 0.92g |
|
| Fats | 0.37g | 33.33g |
|
| Vitamin C | 74.8mg | 0.3mg |
|
| Net carbs | 1.45g | 23.43g |
|
| Carbs | 1.75g | 23.73g |
|
| Cholesterol | 0mg | 15mg |
|
| Vitamin D | 4IU |
|
|
| Magnesium | 5mg | 9mg |
|
| Calcium | 8mg | 59mg |
|
| Potassium | 144mg | 61mg |
|
| Iron | 0.48mg | 0.25mg |
|
| Sugar | 1.26g | 23.39g |
|
| Fiber | 0.3g | 0.3g | |
| Copper | 0.028mg | 0.035mg |
|
| Zinc | 0.11mg | 0.25mg |
|
| Phosphorus | 11mg | 49mg |
|
| Sodium | 2643mg | 933mg |
|
| Vitamin A | 162IU | 180IU |
|
| Vitamin A | 8µg | 51µg |
|
| Vitamin E | 0.12mg | 2.36mg |
|
| Vitamin D | 0.1µg |
|
|
| Manganese | 0.049mg | 0.131mg |
|
| Selenium | 0µg | 1.2µg |
|
| Vitamin B1 | 0.036mg | 0.024mg |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.082mg | 0.058mg |
|
| Vitamin B3 | 0.254mg | 0.047mg |
|
| Vitamin B5 | 0.11mg | 0.108mg |
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.157mg | 0.022mg |
|
| Vitamin B12 | 0µg | 0.09µg |
|
| Vitamin K | 2.4µg | 50.2µg |
|
| Folate | 6µg | 3µg |
|
| Trans Fat | 0.144g |
|
|
| Choline | 6mg |
|
|
| Saturated Fat | 0.052g | 6.061g |
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 0.03g | 8.207g |
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.196g | 17.326g |
|
| Tryptophan | 0.007mg |
|
|
| Threonine | 0.019mg |
|
|
| Isoleucine | 0.017mg |
|
|
| Leucine | 0.027mg |
|
|
| Lysine | 0.023mg |
|
|
| Methionine | 0.006mg |
|
|
| Phenylalanine | 0.016mg |
|
|
| Valine | 0.022mg |
|
|
| Histidine | 0.01mg |
|
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet | Equal | |
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
27%
18%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
40%
22%
Comparison summary
Which food is richer in minerals?
Poppy seed dressing is relatively richer in minerals
Which food contains less Sodium?
Poppy seed dressing contains less Sodium (difference - 1710mg)
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Hot sauce is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 15mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Hot sauce is lower in Sugar (difference - 22.13g)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Hot sauce is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 6.009g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
?
The foods have equal glycemic indexes ()
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.