Keebler Sugar Cones vs. Graham cracker — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Differences between keebler Sugar Cones and graham cracker
- Keebler Sugar Cones have more vitamin B1, while graham cracker has more phosphorus, folate, magnesium, iron, and fiber.
- Graham cracker's daily need coverage for phosphorus is 26% higher.
- Graham cracker contains 2 times less vitamin B1 than keebler Sugar Cones. Keebler Sugar Cones contain 0.42mg of vitamin B1, while graham cracker contains 0.265mg.
- The amount of sodium in keebler Sugar Cones is lower.
The food types used in this comparison are KEEBLER, Sugar Cones and Cookies, graham crackers, plain or honey (includes cinnamon).
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -29% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +344.4% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +42.9% |
| Contains more IronIron | +18.1% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +9150% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +58.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +13.2% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +20% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
7.3 g
Fats:
3.7 g
Carbs:
78 g
Water:
1 g
Other:
10 g
Protein:
6.69 g
Fats:
10.6 g
Carbs:
77.66 g
Water:
3.39 g
Other:
1.66 g
| Contains more OtherOther | +502.4% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +186.5% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +239% |
~equal in
Protein
~6.69g
~equal in
Carbs
~77.66g
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.8 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
2 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.8 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
1.633 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
2.509 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
5.388 g
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -51% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +25.5% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +573.5% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol | Equal | ||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Manganese | 1.019mg | 44% | |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.8g | 5.388g | 31% |
| Phosphorus | 2mg | 185mg | 26% |
| Folate | 0µg | 91µg | 23% |
| Starch | 46.56g | 19% | |
| Copper | 0.17mg | 19% | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.42mg | 0.265mg | 13% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.156mg | 12% | |
| Vitamin K | 14.3µg | 12% | |
| Selenium | 6.3µg | 11% | |
| Fats | 3.7g | 10.6g | 11% |
| Vitamin E | 1.51mg | 10% | |
| Zinc | 0.96mg | 9% | |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.42mg | 8% | |
| Calcium | 77mg | 8% | |
| Iron | 3.2mg | 3.78mg | 7% |
| Magnesium | 9mg | 40mg | 7% |
| Sodium | 326mg | 459mg | 6% |
| Vitamin B3 | 3.7mg | 4.439mg | 5% |
| Fiber | 2.1g | 3.4g | 5% |
| Saturated fat | 0.8g | 1.633g | 4% |
| Calories | 375kcal | 430kcal | 3% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.28mg | 0.317mg | 3% |
| Potassium | 119mg | 170mg | 2% |
| Protein | 7.3g | 6.69g | 1% |
| Choline | 5.9mg | 1% | |
| Monounsaturated fat | 2g | 2.509g | 1% |
| Fructose | 0.99g | 1% | |
| Carbs | 78g | 77.66g | 0% |
| Net carbs | 75.9g | 74.26g | N/A |
| Sugar | 26.4g | 24.85g | N/A |
| Trans fat | 0g | 0.055g | N/A |
| Omega-3 - ALA | 0.599g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Gamma-linoleic acid | 0.024g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid | 0.004g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Linoleic acid | 4.735g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
18%
32%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
18%
60%
Comparison summary
Which food contains less Sodium?
Keebler Sugar Cones contains less Sodium (difference - 133mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Keebler Sugar Cones is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 0.833g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Keebler Sugar Cones is lower in glycemic index (difference - 74)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Graham cracker is lower in Sugar (difference - 1.55g)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Graham cracker is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Graham cracker is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food contains less Cholesterol?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Cholesterol (0 mg)
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)