Kielbasa vs. Chinese cuisine — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
What are the differences between kielbasa and chinese cuisine?
- Kielbasa is higher in monounsaturated fat, yet chinese cuisine is higher in vitamin A and fiber.
- Kielbasa's daily need coverage for sodium is 34% more.
- Kielbasa has 7 times more monounsaturated fat than chinese cuisine. While kielbasa has 8.27g of monounsaturated fat, chinese cuisine has only 1.217g.
- The amount of saturated fat in chinese cuisine is lower.
- The glycemic index of kielbasa is lower.
We used Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked and Restaurant, Chinese, beef and vegetables types in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more IronIron | +11.7% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -65.9% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +27.6% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
13.1 g
Fats:
17.6 g
Carbs:
3.9 g
Water:
62 g
Other:
3.4 g
Protein:
7.08 g
Fats:
5.3 g
Carbs:
7.29 g
Water:
78.82 g
Other:
1.51 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +85% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +232.1% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +125.2% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +86.9% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +27.1% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
6.23 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
8.27 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
2.33 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.978 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
1.217 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
2.13 g
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +579.5% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -84.3% |
~equal in
Polyunsaturated fat
~2.13g
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin K | 51.3µg | 43% | |
| Sodium | 1200mg | 409mg | 34% |
| Saturated fat | 6.23g | 0.978g | 24% |
| Vitamin B12 | 0.48µg | 20% | |
| Fats | 17.6g | 5.3g | 19% |
| Cholesterol | 70mg | 14mg | 19% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 8.27g | 1.217g | 18% |
| Zinc | 1.5mg | 14% | |
| Protein | 13.1g | 7.08g | 12% |
| Selenium | 6.7µg | 12% | |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.161mg | 12% | |
| Phosphorus | 76mg | 11% | |
| Folate | 45µg | 11% | |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.443mg | 9% | |
| Vitamin B3 | 1.32mg | 8% | |
| Vitamin A | 0µg | 63µg | 7% |
| Manganese | 0.147mg | 6% | |
| Choline | 34.5mg | 6% | |
| Calories | 226kcal | 105kcal | 6% |
| Potassium | 204mg | 6% | |
| Fiber | 0g | 1.5g | 6% |
| Vitamin E | 0.82mg | 5% | |
| Copper | 0.049mg | 5% | |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.055mg | 4% | |
| Magnesium | 15mg | 4% | |
| Vitamin C | 14.8mg | 11.6mg | 4% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.033mg | 3% | |
| Iron | 1.24mg | 1.11mg | 2% |
| Calcium | 22mg | 2% | |
| Vitamin D | 0.1µg | 1% | |
| Fructose | 0.55g | 1% | |
| Carbs | 3.9g | 7.29g | 1% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 2.33g | 2.13g | 1% |
| Starch | 1.82g | 1% | |
| Net carbs | 3.9g | 5.79g | N/A |
| Vitamin D | 3IU | 0% | |
| Sugar | 0g | 2.41g | N/A |
| Trans fat | 0.058g | N/A | |
| Tryptophan | 0.083mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.313mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 0.314mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 0.525mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 0.552mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.158mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.317mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 0.327mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.207mg | 0% | |
| Omega-3 - EPA | 0.004g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - DHA | 0.001g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - ALA | 0.264g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - DPA | 0.005g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Gamma-linoleic acid | 0.001g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Dihomo-gamma-linoleic acid | 0.004g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid | 0.002g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Linoleic acid | 1.803g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
4%
33%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
20%
28%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Kielbasa is lower in Sugar (difference - 2.41g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Kielbasa is lower in glycemic index (difference - 32)
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Chinese cuisine is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 56mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Chinese cuisine contains less Sodium (difference - 791mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Chinese cuisine is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 5.252g)
Which food is cheaper?
Chinese cuisine is cheaper (difference - $1.5)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Chinese cuisine is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Chinese cuisine is relatively richer in vitamins