Kielbasa vs Chuck steak - In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
The main differences between Kielbasa and Chuck steak
- Kielbasa has more Polyunsaturated fat, however Chuck steak has more Vitamin C, Iron, and Monounsaturated Fat.
- Daily need coverage for Sodium from Kielbasa is 49% higher.
- Chuck steak has 3 times less Polyunsaturated fat than Kielbasa. Kielbasa has 2.33g of Polyunsaturated fat, while Chuck steak has 0.81g.
- Chuck steak is lower in Sodium.
Food types used in this article are Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked and Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled.
Infographic

Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" chart below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
Contains
more
Iron
+97.6%
Contains
less
Sodium
-94.1%
Contains
more
Iron
+97.6%
Contains
less
Sodium
-94.1%
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" chart below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
:
Contains
more
Vitamin C
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin C
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+∞%
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the most right column. It shows the amounts side by side, making it easier to realize the amount of difference.
![]() |
![]() |
||
Lower in Cholesterol |
![]() |
||
Lower in Saturated Fat |
![]() |
||
Lower in price |
![]() |
||
Lower in Sodium |
![]() |
||
Lower in glycemic index |
![]() |
||
Rich in minerals |
![]() |
||
Rich in vitamins |
![]() |
||
Lower in Sugar | Equal |
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
Nutrient | ![]() |
![]() |
Opinion |
Net carbs | 3.9g | 0g |
![]() |
Protein | 13.1g | 24.98g |
![]() |
Fats | 17.6g | 19.64g |
![]() |
Carbs | 3.9g | 0g |
![]() |
Calories | 226kcal | 277kcal |
![]() |
Starch | g | g | |
Fructose | g | g | |
Sugar | 0g | 0g | |
Fiber | 0g | 0g | |
Calcium | mg | 16mg |
![]() |
Iron | 1.24mg | 2.45mg |
![]() |
Magnesium | mg | 22mg |
![]() |
Phosphorus | mg | 193mg |
![]() |
Potassium | mg | 325mg |
![]() |
Sodium | 1200mg | 71mg |
![]() |
Zinc | mg | 8.68mg |
![]() |
Copper | mg | 0.077mg |
![]() |
Vitamin A | 0IU | 25IU |
![]() |
Vitamin E | mg | 0.1mg |
![]() |
Vitamin D | IU | 5IU |
![]() |
Vitamin D | µg | 0.1µg |
![]() |
Vitamin C | 14.8mg | 0mg |
![]() |
Vitamin B1 | mg | 0.066mg |
![]() |
Vitamin B2 | mg | 0.191mg |
![]() |
Vitamin B3 | mg | 4.663mg |
![]() |
Vitamin B5 | mg | 0.752mg |
![]() |
Vitamin B6 | mg | 0.373mg |
![]() |
Folate | µg | 6µg |
![]() |
Vitamin B12 | µg | 3.03µg |
![]() |
Vitamin K | µg | 1.6µg |
![]() |
Tryptophan | mg | 0.281mg |
![]() |
Threonine | mg | 1.099mg |
![]() |
Isoleucine | mg | 1.062mg |
![]() |
Leucine | mg | 2.009mg |
![]() |
Lysine | mg | 2.184mg |
![]() |
Methionine | mg | 0.709mg |
![]() |
Phenylalanine | mg | 0.951mg |
![]() |
Valine | mg | 1.129mg |
![]() |
Histidine | mg | 0.809mg |
![]() |
Cholesterol | 70mg | 87mg |
![]() |
Trans Fat | g | 1.287g |
![]() |
Saturated Fat | 6.23g | 8.66g |
![]() |
Monounsaturated Fat | 8.27g | 9.457g |
![]() |
Polyunsaturated fat | 2.33g | 0.81g |
![]() |
Which food is preferable for your diet?


is better in case of low diet
![]() |
![]() |
|
Low Fats diet |
![]() |
|
Low Carbs diet |
![]() |
|
Low Calories diet |
![]() |
|
Low glycemic index diet |
![]() |
People also compare
Vitamin and Mineral Summary Scores
The summary score is calculated by summing up the daily values contained in 300 grams of the product. Obviously the more the food fulfills human daily needs, the more the summary score is.
Vitamin Summary Score
4

56

Mineral Summary Score
25

62

Macronutrients Comparison
Macronutrient comparison charts compare the amount of protein, total fats, and total carbohydrates in 300 grams of the food. The displayed values show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of food.
Protein
79%

150%

Carbohydrates
4%

0%

Fats
81%

91%

Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?

Kielbasa is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 17mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?

Kielbasa is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 2.43g)
Which food is cheaper?

Kielbasa is cheaper (difference - $0.5)
Which food contains less Sodium?

Chuck steak contains less Sodium (difference - 1129mg)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?

Chuck steak is lower in glycemic index (difference - 28)
Which food is richer in minerals?

Chuck steak is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?

Chuck steak is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food contains less Sugar?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Sugar (0 g)