Kielbasa vs. Chuck steak — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
The main differences between Kielbasa and Chuck steak
- Kielbasa has more Vitamin C, and Polyunsaturated fat, however, Chuck steak has more Iron, and Monounsaturated Fat.
- Daily need coverage for Sodium from Kielbasa is 49% higher.
- Chuck steak is lower in Sodium.
Food types used in this article are Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked and Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled.
Fat Type Comparison
Comparison summary table
|Lower in Cholesterol|
|Lower in Saturated Fat|
|Lower in price|
|Lower in Sodium|
|Lower in Glycemic Index|
|Rich in minerals|
|Rich in vitamins|
|Lower in Sugar||Equal|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
|Vitamin A RAE||0µg||7µg|
|Omega-3 - EPA||0.001g|
|Omega-3 - DPA||0.004g|
|Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid||0.006g|
|Omega-6 - Linoleic acid||0.619g|
|Omega-3 - ALA||0.041g|
Which food is preferable for your diet?
|Low Fats diet|
|Low Carbs diet|
|Low Calories diet|
|Low Glycemic Index diet|