Kielbasa vs. Chuck steak — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
The main differences between kielbasa and chuck steak
- Kielbasa has more vitamin C and polyunsaturated fat; however, chuck steak has more iron and monounsaturated fat.
- Daily need coverage for sodium for kielbasa is 49% higher.
- Chuck steak is lower in sodium.
- Kielbasa has a higher glycemic index than chuck steak.
Food types used in this article are Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked and Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more IronIron | +97.6% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -94.1% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
13.1 g
Fats:
17.6 g
Carbs:
3.9 g
Water:
62 g
Other:
3.4 g
Protein:
24.98 g
Fats:
19.64 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
55.22 g
Other:
0.16 g
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +12.3% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +2025% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +90.7% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +11.6% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
6.23 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
8.27 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
2.33 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
8.66 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
9.457 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.81 g
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -28.1% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +187.7% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +14.4% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin B12 | 3.03µg | 126% | |
| Zinc | 8.68mg | 79% | |
| Selenium | 27.5µg | 50% | |
| Sodium | 1200mg | 71mg | 49% |
| Vitamin B3 | 4.663mg | 29% | |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.373mg | 29% | |
| Phosphorus | 193mg | 28% | |
| Protein | 13.1g | 24.98g | 24% |
| Vitamin C | 14.8mg | 0mg | 16% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.191mg | 15% | |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.752mg | 15% | |
| Iron | 1.24mg | 2.45mg | 15% |
| Choline | 79mg | 14% | |
| Saturated fat | 6.23g | 8.66g | 11% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 2.33g | 0.81g | 10% |
| Potassium | 325mg | 10% | |
| Copper | 0.077mg | 9% | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.066mg | 6% | |
| Cholesterol | 70mg | 87mg | 6% |
| Magnesium | 22mg | 5% | |
| Monounsaturated fat | 8.27g | 9.457g | 3% |
| Calories | 226kcal | 277kcal | 3% |
| Fats | 17.6g | 19.64g | 3% |
| Folate | 6µg | 2% | |
| Calcium | 16mg | 2% | |
| Manganese | 0.012mg | 1% | |
| Vitamin D | 0.1µg | 1% | |
| Vitamin E | 0.1mg | 1% | |
| Vitamin A | 0µg | 7µg | 1% |
| Vitamin K | 1.6µg | 1% | |
| Vitamin D | 5IU | 1% | |
| Carbs | 3.9g | 0g | 1% |
| Net carbs | 3.9g | 0g | N/A |
| Trans fat | 1.287g | N/A | |
| Tryptophan | 0.281mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 1.099mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 1.062mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 2.009mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 2.184mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.709mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.951mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 1.129mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.809mg | 0% | |
| Omega-3 - EPA | 0.001g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - ALA | 0.041g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - DPA | 0.004g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid | 0.006g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Linoleic acid | 0.619g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
4%
55%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
20%
65%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Kielbasa is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 17mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Kielbasa is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 2.43g)
Which food is cheaper?
Kielbasa is cheaper (difference - $0.5)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Chuck steak contains less Sodium (difference - 1129mg)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Chuck steak is lower in glycemic index (difference - 28)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Chuck steak is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Chuck steak is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food contains less Sugar?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Sugar (0 g)