Kielbasa vs Chuck steak - In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
The main differences between Kielbasa and Chuck steak
- Kielbasa has more Polyunsaturated fat, however Chuck steak has more Vitamin C, Iron, and Monounsaturated Fat.
- Daily need coverage for Sodium from Kielbasa is 49% higher.
- Chuck steak has 3 times less Polyunsaturated fat than Kielbasa. Kielbasa has 2.33g of Polyunsaturated fat, while Chuck steak has 0.81g.
- Chuck steak is lower in Sodium.
Food types used in this article are Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked and Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled.
Comparison summary table
|Lower in Cholesterol|
|Lower in Saturated Fat|
|Lower in price|
|Lower in Sodium|
|Lower in glycemic index|
|Rich in minerals|
|Rich in vitamins|
|Lower in Sugar||Equal|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
Which food is preferable for your diet?
|Low Fats diet|
|Low Carbs diet|
|Low Calories diet|
|Low glycemic index diet|