Kielbasa vs. Flank steak — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Important differences between kielbasa and flank steak
- Kielbasa has more vitamin C, monounsaturated fat, and polyunsaturated fat; however, flank steak has more iron.
- Kielbasa's daily need coverage for sodium is 50% more.
- Flank steak is lower in sodium.
- Kielbasa has a higher glycemic index than flank steak.
The food varieties used in the comparison are Kielbasa, Polish, turkey, and beef, smoked and Beef, flank, steak, separable lean, and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more IronIron | +40.3% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -95.3% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient |  |
 |
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin B12 | 1.63µg | 68% | |
| Selenium | 29.4µg | 53% | |
| Sodium | 1200mg | 56mg | 50% |
| Vitamin B3 | 7.363mg | 46% | |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.579mg | 45% | |
| Zinc | 4.9mg | 45% | |
| Phosphorus | 210mg | 30% | |
| Protein | 13.1g | 27.66g | 29% |
| Choline | 105.4mg | 19% | |
| Vitamin C | 14.8mg | 0mg | 16% |
| Fats | 17.6g | 8.23g | 14% |
| Saturated fat | 6.23g | 3.395g | 13% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 2.33g | 0.322g | 13% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 8.27g | 3.317g | 12% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.545mg | 11% | |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.133mg | 10% | |
| Potassium | 339mg | 10% | |
| Copper | 0.082mg | 9% | |
| Iron | 1.24mg | 1.74mg | 6% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.075mg | 6% | |
| Magnesium | 23mg | 5% | |
| Cholesterol | 70mg | 79mg | 3% |
| Vitamin E | 0.38mg | 3% | |
| Folate | 9µg | 2% | |
| Calories | 226kcal | 192kcal | 2% |
| Calcium | 20mg | 2% | |
| Vitamin K | 1.4µg | 1% | |
| Carbs | 3.9g | 0g | 1% |
| Net carbs | 3.9g | 0g | N/A |
| Manganese | 0.009mg | 0% | |
| Tryptophan | 0.182mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 1.105mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 1.259mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 2.201mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 2.338mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.72mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 1.093mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 1.372mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.883mg | 0% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
13.1 g
Fats:
17.6 g
Carbs:
3.9 g
Water:
62 g
Other:
3.4 g
Protein:
27.66 g
Fats:
8.23 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
64.17 g
Other:
0 g
| Contains more FatsFats | +113.9% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +-5766.7% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +111.1% |
~equal in
Water
~64.17g
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
6.23 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
8.27 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
2.33 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
3.395 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
3.317 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.322 g
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +149.3% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +623.6% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -45.5% |
