Kielbasa vs. Table salt — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Differences between kielbasa and table salt
- Table salt contains less vitamin C, iron, polyunsaturated fat, and monounsaturated fat than kielbasa.
- Table salt's daily need coverage for sodium is 1633% higher.
- Table salt has a lower glycemic index. The glycemic index of table salt is 0, while the glycemic index of kielbasa is 28.
The food types used in this comparison are Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked and Salt, table.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more IronIron | +275.8% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -96.9% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
13.1 g
Fats:
17.6 g
Carbs:
3.9 g
Water:
62 g
Other:
3.4 g
Protein:
0 g
Fats:
0 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
0.2 g
Other:
99.8 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +∞% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +∞% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +30900% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +2835.3% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Sodium | 1200mg | 38758mg | 1633% |
| Saturated fat | 6.23g | 0g | 28% |
| Fats | 17.6g | 0g | 27% |
| Protein | 13.1g | 0g | 26% |
| Cholesterol | 70mg | 0mg | 23% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 8.27g | 0g | 21% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 2.33g | 0g | 16% |
| Vitamin C | 14.8mg | 0mg | 16% |
| Iron | 1.24mg | 0.33mg | 11% |
| Calories | 226kcal | 0kcal | 11% |
| Manganese | 0.1mg | 4% | |
| Copper | 0.03mg | 3% | |
| Calcium | 24mg | 2% | |
| Zinc | 0.1mg | 1% | |
| Carbs | 3.9g | 0g | 1% |
| Net carbs | 3.9g | 0g | N/A |
| Magnesium | 1mg | 0% | |
| Potassium | 8mg | 0% | |
| Selenium | 0.1µg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
4%
0%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
20%
510%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Table salt is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 70mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Table salt is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 6.23g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Table salt is lower in glycemic index (difference - 28)
Which food is cheaper?
Table salt is cheaper (difference - $1.4)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Table salt is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Table salt is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food contains less Sodium?
Kielbasa contains less Sodium (difference - 37558mg)
Which food contains less Sugar?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Sugar (0 g)