Kielbasa vs. Table salt — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison

Compare

Differences between kielbasa and table salt

Table salt contains less vitamin C, iron, monounsaturated fat, and polyunsaturated fat than kielbasa.
Table salt's daily need coverage for sodium is 1633% higher.
Table salt has a lower glycemic index. The glycemic index of table salt is 0, while the glycemic index of kielbasa is 28.

The food types used in this comparison are Kielbasa, Polish, turkey, and beef, smoked and Salt, table.

Infographic

Infographic link

Mineral Comparison

Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.

Kielbasa

Table salt

Contains more IronIron	+275.8%
Contains less SodiumSodium	-96.9%

~equal in Phosphorus ~0mg

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.

Kielbasa

Table salt

Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C

+∞%

~equal in Vitamin A ~0µg

~equal in Vitamin E ~0mg

~equal in Vitamin D ~0µg

~equal in Vitamin B1 ~0mg

~equal in Vitamin B2 ~0mg

~equal in Vitamin B3 ~0mg

~equal in Vitamin B5 ~0mg

~equal in Vitamin B6 ~0mg

~equal in Vitamin B12 ~0µg

~equal in Vitamin K ~0µg

~equal in Folate ~0µg

~equal in Choline ~0mg

All nutrients comparison - raw data values

Nutrient			DV% diff.
Sodium	1200mg	38758mg	1633%
Saturated fat	6.23g	0g	28%
Fats	17.6g	0g	27%
Protein	13.1g	0g	26%
Cholesterol	70mg	0mg	23%
Monounsaturated fat	8.27g	0g	21%
Polyunsaturated fat	2.33g	0g	16%
Vitamin C	14.8mg	0mg	16%
Iron	1.24mg	0.33mg	11%
Calories	226kcal	0kcal	11%
Manganese		0.1mg	4%
Copper		0.03mg	3%
Calcium		24mg	2%
Zinc		0.1mg	1%
Carbs	3.9g	0g	1%
Net carbs	3.9g	0g	N/A
Magnesium		1mg	0%
Potassium		8mg	0%
Selenium		0.1µg	0%