Kielbasa vs. Tomato paste — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Significant differences between kielbasa and tomato paste
- Kielbasa has more monounsaturated fat and polyunsaturated fat; however, tomato paste is richer in vitamin A, iron, fiber, and vitamin C.
- Kielbasa covers your daily sodium needs 50% more than tomato paste.
- Tomato paste has a higher glycemic index. The glycemic index of tomato paste is 45, while the glycemic index of kielbasa is 28.
Specific food types used in this comparison are Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked and Tomato products, canned, paste, without salt added.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more IronIron | +140.3% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -95.1% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +48% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
13.1 g
Fats:
17.6 g
Carbs:
3.9 g
Water:
62 g
Other:
3.4 g
Protein:
4.32 g
Fats:
0.47 g
Carbs:
18.91 g
Water:
73.5 g
Other:
2.8 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +203.2% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +3644.7% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +21.4% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +384.9% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +18.5% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
6.23 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
8.27 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
2.33 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.1 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.067 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.16 g
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +12243.3% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +1356.3% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -98.4% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Sodium | 1200mg | 59mg | 50% |
| Copper | 0.365mg | 41% | |
| Potassium | 1014mg | 30% | |
| Vitamin E | 4.3mg | 29% | |
| Saturated fat | 6.23g | 0.1g | 28% |
| Fats | 17.6g | 0.47g | 26% |
| Cholesterol | 70mg | 0mg | 23% |
| Iron | 1.24mg | 2.98mg | 22% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 8.27g | 0.067g | 21% |
| Vitamin B3 | 3.076mg | 19% | |
| Protein | 13.1g | 4.32g | 18% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.216mg | 17% | |
| Fiber | 0g | 4.1g | 16% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 2.33g | 0.16g | 14% |
| Manganese | 0.302mg | 13% | |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.153mg | 12% | |
| Phosphorus | 83mg | 12% | |
| Selenium | 5.3µg | 10% | |
| Magnesium | 42mg | 10% | |
| Vitamin K | 11.4µg | 10% | |
| Vitamin A | 0µg | 76µg | 8% |
| Vitamin C | 14.8mg | 21.9mg | 8% |
| Choline | 38.5mg | 7% | |
| Calories | 226kcal | 82kcal | 7% |
| Fructose | 5.85g | 7% | |
| Zinc | 0.63mg | 6% | |
| Carbs | 3.9g | 18.91g | 5% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.06mg | 5% | |
| Calcium | 36mg | 4% | |
| Folate | 12µg | 3% | |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.142mg | 3% | |
| Net carbs | 3.9g | 14.81g | N/A |
| Sugar | 0g | 12.18g | N/A |
| Starch | 0.22g | 0% | |
| Tryptophan | 0.031mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.133mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 0.089mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 0.124mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 0.134mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.027mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.13mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 0.088mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.071mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
4%
31%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
20%
49%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Tomato paste is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 70mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Tomato paste contains less Sodium (difference - 1141mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Tomato paste is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 6.13g)
Which food is cheaper?
Tomato paste is cheaper (difference - $1.5)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Tomato paste is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Tomato paste is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Kielbasa is lower in Sugar (difference - 12.18g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Kielbasa is lower in glycemic index (difference - 17)