Kielbasa vs. Turkey wing — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
How are kielbasa and turkey wing different?
- Kielbasa has more vitamin C and monounsaturated fat than turkey wing.
- Daily need coverage for sodium for kielbasa is 50% higher.
- Turkey wing has less sodium.
- Turkey wing has a lower glycemic index (0) than kielbasa (28).
Kielbasa, Polish, turkey, and beef, smoked and Turkey, all classes, wing, meat, and skin, raw are the varieties used in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -95.4% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
13.1 g
Fats:
17.6 g
Carbs:
3.9 g
Water:
62 g
Other:
3.4 g
Protein:
20.22 g
Fats:
12.32 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
66.49 g
Other:
0.97 g
| Contains more FatsFats | +42.9% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +250.5% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +54.4% |
~equal in
Water
~66.49g
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
6.23 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
8.27 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
2.33 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
3.28 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
4.97 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
2.86 g
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +66.4% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -47.4% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +22.7% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Sodium | 1200mg | 55mg | 50% |
| Selenium | 22.4µg | 41% | |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.41mg | 32% | |
| Vitamin B3 | 4.425mg | 28% | |
| Phosphorus | 165mg | 24% | |
| Vitamin B12 | 0.39µg | 16% | |
| Vitamin C | 14.8mg | 0mg | 16% |
| Zinc | 1.54mg | 14% | |
| Protein | 13.1g | 20.22g | 14% |
| Saturated fat | 6.23g | 3.28g | 13% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.554mg | 11% | |
| Copper | 0.077mg | 9% | |
| Monounsaturated fat | 8.27g | 4.97g | 8% |
| Fats | 17.6g | 12.32g | 8% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.11mg | 8% | |
| Potassium | 240mg | 7% | |
| Magnesium | 21mg | 5% | |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 2.33g | 2.86g | 4% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.05mg | 4% | |
| Folate | 7µg | 2% | |
| Calories | 226kcal | 197kcal | 1% |
| Manganese | 0.017mg | 1% | |
| Calcium | 14mg | 1% | |
| Carbs | 3.9g | 0g | 1% |
| Net carbs | 3.9g | 0g | N/A |
| Cholesterol | 70mg | 70mg | 0% |
| Iron | 1.24mg | 1.26mg | 0% |
| Vitamin A | 0µg | 3µg | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.217mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.866mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 0.975mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 1.531mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 1.773mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.551mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.78mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 1.031mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.585mg | 0% | |
| Omega-3 - DHA | 0.01g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - DPA | 0.01g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
4%
23%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
20%
36%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Turkey wing is lower in Sugar (difference - 0g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Turkey wing contains less Sodium (difference - 1145mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Turkey wing is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 2.95g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Turkey wing is lower in glycemic index (difference - 28)
Which food is cheaper?
Turkey wing is cheaper (difference - $1.5)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Turkey wing is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Turkey wing is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food contains less Cholesterol?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Cholesterol (70 mg)