Foodstruct Nutrition Search | Diet Analysis | Food Comparison | Glycemic Index Chart | Insulin Index Chart | Blog | Subscribe | Sign Up

Limburger vs. Coleslaw — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison

Compare

Differences between Limburger and coleslaw

  • Limburger has more phosphorus, calcium, vitamin B12, vitamin B2, vitamin A, and vitamin B5, while coleslaw has more vitamin K.
  • Limburger's daily need coverage for saturated fat is 76% higher.
  • Coleslaw contains 104 times less vitamin B12 than Limburger. Limburger contains 1.04µg of vitamin B12, while coleslaw contains 0.01µg.
  • The amount of cholesterol in coleslaw is lower.
  • Limburger has a lower glycemic index. The glycemic index of Limburger is 27, while the glycemic index of coleslaw is 39.

The food types used in this comparison are Cheese, limburger and Fast foods, coleslaw.

Infographic

Limburger vs Coleslaw infographic
Infographic link

Mineral Comparison

Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 15% 149% 11% 4.9% 7% 57% 168% 104% 5% 79%
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 5.7% 9% 11% 8.3% 5% 3.8% 8.6% 26% 13% 0%
Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium +162.5%
Contains more CalciumCalcium +1556.7%
Contains more CopperCopper +40%
Contains more ZincZinc +1400%
Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus +1865%
Contains more SeleniumSelenium +∞%
Contains more IronIron +69.2%
Contains less SodiumSodium -74.6%
Contains more ManganeseManganese +168.4%
~equal in Potassium ~129mg

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 0% 113% 4.6% 7.5% 20% 116% 3% 71% 20% 130% 5.8% 44% 8.4%
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 49% 9.3% 11% 0% 6.5% 4.6% 3.9% 15% 26% 1.3% 177% 0% 0%
Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A +1114.3%
Contains more Vitamin DVitamin D +∞%
Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 +207.7%
Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 +2415%
Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 +378.5%
Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 +10300%
Contains more FolateFolate +∞%
Contains more CholineCholine +∞%
Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C +∞%
Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E +134.8%
Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 +30.4%
Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 +30.2%
Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K +2982.6%

Macronutrient Comparison

Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
20% 27% 48% 4%
Protein: 20.05 g
Fats: 27.25 g
Carbs: 0.49 g
Water: 48.42 g
Other: 3.79 g
10% 15% 73%
Protein: 0.95 g
Fats: 9.91 g
Carbs: 14.89 g
Water: 73.42 g
Other: 0.83 g
Contains more ProteinProtein +2010.5%
Contains more FatsFats +175%
Contains more OtherOther +356.6%
Contains more CarbsCarbs +2938.8%
Contains more WaterWater +51.6%

Fat Type Comparison

Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
65% 33% 2%
Saturated fat: Sat. Fat 16.746 g
Monounsaturated fat: Mono. Fat 8.606 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 0.495 g
17% 28% 56%
Saturated fat: Sat. Fat 1.599 g
Monounsaturated fat: Mono. Fat 2.671 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 5.348 g
Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat +222.2%
Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat -90.5%
Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat +980.4%

Comparison summary table

Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
Limburger Coleslaw
Lower in Sugar ok
Lower in Glycemic Index ok
Rich in minerals ok
Lower in Cholesterol ok
Lower in Sodium ok
Lower in Saturated fat ok
Lower in price ok
Rich in vitamins Equal

All nutrients comparison - raw data values

Nutrient Limburger Coleslaw DV% diff.
Saturated fat 16.746g 1.599g 69%
Vitamin K 2.3µg 70.9µg 57%
Phosphorus 393mg 20mg 53%
Calcium 497mg 30mg 47%
Vitamin B12 1.04µg 0.01µg 43%
Protein 20.05g 0.95g 38%
Vitamin B2 0.503mg 0.02mg 37%
Vitamin A 340µg 28µg 35%
Polyunsaturated fat 0.495g 5.348g 32%
Cholesterol 90mg 4mg 29%
Fats 27.25g 9.91g 27%
Selenium 14.5µg 26%
Sodium 800mg 203mg 26%
Vitamin B5 1.177mg 0.246mg 19%
Zinc 2.1mg 0.14mg 18%
Vitamin C 0mg 14.6mg 16%
Monounsaturated fat 8.606g 2.671g 15%
Folate 58µg 15%
Calories 327kcal 153kcal 9%
Fiber 0g 1.9g 8%
Vitamin B1 0.08mg 0.026mg 5%
Carbs 0.49g 14.89g 5%
Vitamin D 0.5µg 3%
Manganese 0.038mg 0.102mg 3%
Magnesium 21mg 8mg 3%
Vitamin D 20IU 3%
Choline 15.4mg 3%
Fructose 1.44g 2%
Vitamin B6 0.086mg 0.112mg 2%
Vitamin E 0.23mg 0.54mg 2%
Copper 0.021mg 0.015mg 1%
Iron 0.13mg 0.22mg 1%
Net carbs 0.49g 12.99g N/A
Potassium 128mg 129mg 0%
Sugar 0.49g 12.19g N/A
Vitamin B3 0.158mg 0.206mg 0%
Trans fat 0.037g N/A
Tryptophan 0.289mg 0%
Threonine 0.739mg 0%
Isoleucine 1.219mg 0%
Leucine 2.093mg 0%
Lysine 1.675mg 0%
Methionine 0.619mg 0%
Phenylalanine 1.116mg 0%
Valine 1.439mg 0%
Histidine 0.578mg 0%
Omega-3 - EPA 0g 0.006g N/A
Omega-3 - DHA 0g 0.001g N/A
Omega-3 - ALA 0.279g N/A
Omega-3 - Eicosatrienoic acid 0.001g N/A
Omega-6 - Gamma-linoleic acid 0.024g N/A
Omega-6 - Dihomo-gamma-linoleic acid 0.006g N/A
Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid 0.002g N/A
Omega-6 - Linoleic acid 4.979g N/A

Which food is preferable for your diet?

ok
ok
is better in case of low diet
Limburger Coleslaw
Low Calories diet ok
Low Fats diet ok
Low Carbs diet ok
Low Glycemic Index diet ok

People also compare

Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score

The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
42%
Limburger
23%
Coleslaw
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
60%
Limburger
9%
Coleslaw

Comparison summary

Which food is lower in Sugar?
Limburger
Limburger is lower in Sugar (difference - 11.7g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Limburger
Limburger is lower in glycemic index (difference - 12)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Limburger
Limburger is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Coleslaw
Coleslaw is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 86mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Coleslaw
Coleslaw contains less Sodium (difference - 597mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Coleslaw
Coleslaw is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 15.147g)
Which food is cheaper?
Coleslaw
Coleslaw is cheaper (difference - $3)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.

References

All the values for which the sources are not specified explicitly are taken from FDA’s Food Central. The exact link to the food presented on this page can be found below.

  1. Limburger - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/171243/nutrients
  2. Coleslaw - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/170300/nutrients

All the Daily Values are presented for males aged 31-50, for 2000-calorie diets.

Data provided by FoodStruct.com should be considered and used as information only. Please consult your physician before beginning any diet.