Foodstruct Nutrition Search | Diet Analysis | Food Comparison | Glycemic Index Chart | Insulin Index Chart | Blog | Subscribe | Sign Up

Limburger vs. Soft serve — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison

Compare

Significant differences between Limburger and soft serve

  • The amount of phosphorus, calcium, vitamin B2, vitamin B12, selenium, zinc, vitamin B5, and folate in Limburger is higher than in soft serve.
  • Limburger covers your daily saturated fat needs 46% more than soft serve.
  • Soft serve has 13 times less sodium than Limburger. Limburger has 800mg of sodium, while soft serve has 61mg.
  • Soft serve has a higher glycemic index. The glycemic index of soft serve is 79, while the glycemic index of Limburger is 27.

Specific food types used in this comparison are Cheese, limburger and Ice cream, soft serve, chocolate.

Infographic

Limburger vs Soft serve infographic
Infographic link

Mineral Comparison

Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 15% 149% 11% 4.9% 7% 57% 168% 104% 5% 79%
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 8.6% 39% 16% 7.9% 10% 14% 50% 8% 0.65% 16%
Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium +75%
Contains more CalciumCalcium +279.4%
Contains more ZincZinc +303.8%
Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus +238.8%
Contains more ManganeseManganese +660%
Contains more SeleniumSelenium +383.3%
Contains more PotassiumPotassium +38.3%
Contains more IronIron +61.5%
Contains more CopperCopper +42.9%
Contains less SodiumSodium -92.4%

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 0% 113% 4.6% 7.5% 20% 116% 3% 71% 20% 130% 5.8% 44% 8.4%
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 2.7% 54% 12% 11% 12% 42% 1.8% 30% 11% 63% 2.3% 6.8% 14%
Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A +109.9%
Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 +63.3%
Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 +176.4%
Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 +66.3%
Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 +132.6%
Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 +79.2%
Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 +108%
Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K +155.6%
Contains more FolateFolate +544.4%
Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C +∞%
Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E +165.2%
Contains more Vitamin DVitamin D +40%
Contains more CholineCholine +68.8%

Macronutrient Comparison

Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
20% 27% 48% 4%
Protein: 20.05 g
Fats: 27.25 g
Carbs: 0.49 g
Water: 48.42 g
Other: 3.79 g
4% 13% 22% 60%
Protein: 4.1 g
Fats: 13 g
Carbs: 22.2 g
Water: 59.8 g
Other: 0.9 g
Contains more ProteinProtein +389%
Contains more FatsFats +109.6%
Contains more OtherOther +321.1%
Contains more CarbsCarbs +4430.6%
Contains more WaterWater +23.5%

Fat Type Comparison

Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
65% 33% 2%
Saturated fat: Sat. Fat 16.746 g
Monounsaturated fat: Mono. Fat 8.606 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 0.495 g
65% 31% 4%
Saturated fat: Sat. Fat 7.46 g
Monounsaturated fat: Mono. Fat 3.49 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 0.46 g
Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat +146.6%
Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat -55.5%
~equal in Polyunsaturated fat ~0.46g

Comparison summary table

Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
Limburger Soft serve
Lower in Sodium ok
Lower in Saturated fat ok
Lower in price ok
Lower in Cholesterol ok
Lower in Sugar ok
Lower in Glycemic Index ok
Rich in minerals ok
Rich in vitamins ok

All nutrients comparison - raw data values

Nutrient Limburger Soft serve DV% diff.
Saturated fat 16.746g 7.46g 42%
Phosphorus 393mg 116mg 40%
Calcium 497mg 131mg 37%
Protein 20.05g 4.1g 32%
Sodium 800mg 61mg 32%
Vitamin B2 0.503mg 0.182mg 25%
Vitamin B12 1.04µg 0.5µg 23%
Fats 27.25g 13g 22%
Selenium 14.5µg 3µg 21%
Vitamin A 340µg 162µg 20%
Zinc 2.1mg 0.52mg 14%
Monounsaturated fat 8.606g 3.49g 13%
Vitamin B5 1.177mg 0.506mg 13%
Folate 58µg 9µg 12%
Carbs 0.49g 22.2g 7%
Calories 327kcal 222kcal 5%
Vitamin E 0.23mg 0.61mg 3%
Fiber 0g 0.7g 3%
Vitamin B1 0.08mg 0.049mg 3%
Vitamin B6 0.086mg 0.048mg 3%
Magnesium 21mg 12mg 2%
Choline 15.4mg 26mg 2%
Copper 0.021mg 0.03mg 1%
Vitamin C 0mg 0.8mg 1%
Vitamin K 2.3µg 0.9µg 1%
Vitamin D 20IU 29IU 1%
Caffeine 0mg 2mg 1%
Potassium 128mg 177mg 1%
Iron 0.13mg 0.21mg 1%
Manganese 0.038mg 0.005mg 1%
Vitamin D 0.5µg 0.7µg 1%
Net carbs 0.49g 21.5g N/A
Cholesterol 90mg 91mg 0%
Sugar 0.49g 21.16g N/A
Vitamin B3 0.158mg 0.095mg 0%
Polyunsaturated fat 0.495g 0.46g 0%
Tryptophan 0.289mg 0.048mg 0%
Threonine 0.739mg 0.169mg 0%
Isoleucine 1.219mg 0.215mg 0%
Leucine 2.093mg 0.353mg 0%
Lysine 1.675mg 0.296mg 0%
Methionine 0.619mg 0.091mg 0%
Phenylalanine 1.116mg 0.176mg 0%
Valine 1.439mg 0.241mg 0%
Histidine 0.578mg 0.099mg 0%

Which food is preferable for your diet?

ok
ok
is better in case of low diet
Limburger Soft serve
Low Calories diet ok
Low Fats diet ok
Low Carbs diet ok
Low Glycemic Index diet ok

People also compare

Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score

The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
42%
Limburger
20%
Soft serve
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
60%
Limburger
17%
Soft serve

Comparison summary

Which food contains less Sodium?
Soft serve
Soft serve contains less Sodium (difference - 739mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Soft serve
Soft serve is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 9.286g)
Which food is cheaper?
Soft serve
Soft serve is cheaper (difference - $3)
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Limburger
Limburger is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 1mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Limburger
Limburger is lower in Sugar (difference - 20.67g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Limburger
Limburger is lower in glycemic index (difference - 52)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Limburger
Limburger is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Limburger
Limburger is relatively richer in vitamins

References

All the values for which the sources are not specified explicitly are taken from FDA’s Food Central. The exact link to the food presented on this page can be found below.

  1. Limburger - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/171243/nutrients
  2. Soft serve - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/173465/nutrients

All the Daily Values are presented for males aged 31-50, for 2000-calorie diets.

Data provided by FoodStruct.com should be considered and used as information only. Please consult your physician before beginning any diet.