Foodstruct Nutrition Search | Diet Analysis | Food Comparison | Glycemic Index Chart | Insulin Index Chart | Blog | Subscribe | Sign Up

Limburger vs. Tomato paste — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison

Compare

Significant differences between Limburger and tomato paste

  • Limburger has more calcium, phosphorus, vitamin B12, and vitamin B2; however, tomato paste is richer in copper, iron, and vitamin E.
  • Limburger covers your daily saturated fat needs 83% more than tomato paste.
  • Tomato paste contains less cholesterol.
  • Tomato paste has a higher glycemic index. The glycemic index of tomato paste is 45, while the glycemic index of Limburger is 27.

Specific food types used in this comparison are Cheese, limburger and Tomato products, canned, paste, without salt added.

Infographic

Limburger vs Tomato paste infographic
Infographic link

Mineral Comparison

Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 15% 149% 11% 4.9% 7% 57% 168% 104% 5% 79%
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 30% 11% 89% 112% 122% 17% 36% 7.7% 39% 29%
Contains more CalciumCalcium +1280.6%
Contains more ZincZinc +233.3%
Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus +373.5%
Contains more SeleniumSelenium +173.6%
Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium +100%
Contains more PotassiumPotassium +692.2%
Contains more IronIron +2192.3%
Contains more CopperCopper +1638.1%
Contains less SodiumSodium -92.6%
Contains more ManganeseManganese +694.7%

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 0% 113% 4.6% 7.5% 20% 116% 3% 71% 20% 130% 5.8% 44% 8.4%
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 73% 25% 86% 0% 15% 35% 58% 8.5% 50% 0% 29% 9% 21%
Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A +347.4%
Contains more Vitamin DVitamin D +∞%
Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 +33.3%
Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 +228.8%
Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 +728.9%
Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 +∞%
Contains more FolateFolate +383.3%
Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C +∞%
Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E +1769.6%
Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 +1846.8%
Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 +151.2%
Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K +395.7%
Contains more CholineCholine +150%

Macronutrient Comparison

Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
20% 27% 48% 4%
Protein: 20.05 g
Fats: 27.25 g
Carbs: 0.49 g
Water: 48.42 g
Other: 3.79 g
4% 19% 74% 3%
Protein: 4.32 g
Fats: 0.47 g
Carbs: 18.91 g
Water: 73.5 g
Other: 2.8 g
Contains more ProteinProtein +364.1%
Contains more FatsFats +5697.9%
Contains more OtherOther +35.4%
Contains more CarbsCarbs +3759.2%
Contains more WaterWater +51.8%

Fat Type Comparison

Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
65% 33% 2%
Saturated fat: Sat. Fat 16.746 g
Monounsaturated fat: Mono. Fat 8.606 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 0.495 g
31% 20% 49%
Saturated fat: Sat. Fat 0.1 g
Monounsaturated fat: Mono. Fat 0.067 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 0.16 g
Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat +12744.8%
Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat +209.4%
Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat -99.4%

Comparison summary table

Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
Limburger Tomato paste
Lower in Cholesterol ok
Lower in Sodium ok
Lower in Saturated fat ok
Lower in price ok
Lower in Sugar ok
Lower in Glycemic Index ok
Rich in minerals Equal
Rich in vitamins Equal

All nutrients comparison - raw data values

Nutrient Limburger Tomato paste DV% diff.
Saturated fat 16.746g 0.1g 76%
Calcium 497mg 36mg 46%
Phosphorus 393mg 83mg 44%
Vitamin B12 1.04µg 0µg 43%
Fats 27.25g 0.47g 41%
Copper 0.021mg 0.365mg 38%
Iron 0.13mg 2.98mg 36%
Sodium 800mg 59mg 32%
Protein 20.05g 4.32g 31%
Cholesterol 90mg 0mg 30%
Vitamin A 340µg 76µg 29%
Vitamin E 0.23mg 4.3mg 27%
Vitamin B2 0.503mg 0.153mg 27%
Potassium 128mg 1014mg 26%
Vitamin C 0mg 21.9mg 24%
Vitamin B5 1.177mg 0.142mg 21%
Monounsaturated fat 8.606g 0.067g 21%
Vitamin B3 0.158mg 3.076mg 18%
Selenium 14.5µg 5.3µg 17%
Fiber 0g 4.1g 16%
Zinc 2.1mg 0.63mg 13%
Folate 58µg 12µg 12%
Calories 327kcal 82kcal 12%
Manganese 0.038mg 0.302mg 11%
Vitamin B6 0.086mg 0.216mg 10%
Vitamin K 2.3µg 11.4µg 8%
Fructose 5.85g 7%
Carbs 0.49g 18.91g 6%
Magnesium 21mg 42mg 5%
Choline 15.4mg 38.5mg 4%
Vitamin D 0.5µg 0µg 3%
Vitamin D 20IU 0IU 3%
Polyunsaturated fat 0.495g 0.16g 2%
Vitamin B1 0.08mg 0.06mg 2%
Net carbs 0.49g 14.81g N/A
Sugar 0.49g 12.18g N/A
Starch 0.22g 0%
Tryptophan 0.289mg 0.031mg 0%
Threonine 0.739mg 0.133mg 0%
Isoleucine 1.219mg 0.089mg 0%
Leucine 2.093mg 0.124mg 0%
Lysine 1.675mg 0.134mg 0%
Methionine 0.619mg 0.027mg 0%
Phenylalanine 1.116mg 0.13mg 0%
Valine 1.439mg 0.088mg 0%
Histidine 0.578mg 0.071mg 0%

Which food is preferable for your diet?

ok
ok
is better in case of low diet
Limburger Tomato paste
Low Calories diet ok
Low Fats diet ok
Low Carbs diet ok
Low Glycemic Index diet ok

People also compare

Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score

The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
42%
Limburger
31%
Tomato paste
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
60%
Limburger
49%
Tomato paste

Comparison summary

Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Tomato paste
Tomato paste is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 90mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Tomato paste
Tomato paste contains less Sodium (difference - 741mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Tomato paste
Tomato paste is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 16.646g)
Which food is cheaper?
Tomato paste
Tomato paste is cheaper (difference - $3)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Limburger
Limburger is lower in Sugar (difference - 11.69g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Limburger
Limburger is lower in glycemic index (difference - 18)
Which food is richer in minerals?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.

References

All the values for which the sources are not specified explicitly are taken from FDA’s Food Central. The exact link to the food presented on this page can be found below.

  1. Limburger - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/171243/nutrients
  2. Tomato paste - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/170459/nutrients

All the Daily Values are presented for males aged 31-50, for 2000-calorie diets.

Data provided by FoodStruct.com should be considered and used as information only. Please consult your physician before beginning any diet.