Rice bran oil vs. Nattō — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Significant differences between rice bran oil and nattō
- Rice bran oil has more vitamin E; however, nattō is richer in iron, zinc, magnesium, phosphorus, calcium, fiber, potassium, and selenium.
- Rice bran oil covers your daily vitamin E needs 215% more than nattō.
- Nattō has 12 times less saturated fat than rice bran oil. Rice bran oil has 19.7g of saturated fat, while nattō has 1.591g.
- Nattō has a higher glycemic index. The glycemic index of nattō is 56, while the glycemic index of rice bran oil is 0.
Specific food types used in this comparison are Oil, rice bran and Natto.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -100% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +∞% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +∞% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +∞% |
| Contains more IronIron | +12185.7% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +∞% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +∞% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +∞% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +322900% |
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
0 g
Fats:
100 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
0 g
Other:
0 g
Protein:
19.4 g
Fats:
11 g
Carbs:
12.68 g
Water:
55.02 g
Other:
1.9 g
| Contains more FatsFats | +809.1% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +∞% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +∞% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +∞% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
19.7 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
39.3 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
35 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
1.591 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
2.43 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
6.21 g
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +1517.3% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +463.6% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -91.9% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin E | 32.3mg | 0.01mg | 215% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 35g | 6.21g | 192% |
| Fats | 100g | 11g | 137% |
| Iron | 0.07mg | 8.6mg | 107% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 39.3g | 2.43g | 92% |
| Saturated fat | 19.7g | 1.591g | 82% |
| Copper | 0.667mg | 74% | |
| Manganese | 1.528mg | 66% | |
| Protein | 0g | 19.4g | 39% |
| Calories | 884kcal | 211kcal | 34% |
| Zinc | 0mg | 3.03mg | 28% |
| Magnesium | 0mg | 115mg | 27% |
| Phosphorus | 0mg | 174mg | 25% |
| Fiber | 0g | 5.4g | 22% |
| Calcium | 0mg | 217mg | 22% |
| Potassium | 0mg | 729mg | 21% |
| Selenium | 0µg | 8.8µg | 16% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0mg | 0.19mg | 15% |
| Vitamin C | 0mg | 13mg | 14% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0mg | 0.16mg | 13% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0mg | 0.13mg | 10% |
| Choline | 57mg | 10% | |
| Vitamin B5 | 0mg | 0.215mg | 4% |
| Carbs | 0g | 12.68g | 4% |
| Folate | 0µg | 8µg | 2% |
| Vitamin K | 24.7µg | 23.1µg | 1% |
| Net carbs | 0g | 7.28g | N/A |
| Sugar | 0g | 4.89g | N/A |
| Sodium | 0mg | 7mg | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0mg | 0.223mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 0mg | 0.813mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 0mg | 0.931mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 0mg | 1.509mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 0mg | 1.145mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0mg | 0.208mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 0mg | 0.941mg | 0% |
| Valine | 0mg | 1.018mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0mg | 0.512mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
54%
20%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
0%
116%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Rice bran oil is lower in Sugar (difference - 4.89g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Rice bran oil contains less Sodium (difference - 7mg)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Rice bran oil is lower in glycemic index (difference - 56)
Which food is cheaper?
Rice bran oil is cheaper (difference - $2.1)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Nattō is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 18.109g)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Nattō is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Nattō is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food contains less Cholesterol?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Cholesterol (0 mg)