Roman chamomile vs. Limburger — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
How are roman chamomile and Limburger different?
- Limburger has more phosphorus, calcium, vitamin B12, vitamin B2, selenium, vitamin B5, and vitamin A than roman chamomile.
- Daily need coverage for saturated fat for Limburger is 84% higher.
- Roman chamomile has less sodium.
Beverages, tea, herb, brewed, chamomile and Cheese, limburger are the varieties used in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -99.9% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +15.8% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +2000% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +24750% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +1322.2% |
| Contains more IronIron | +62.5% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +40% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +5150% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +∞% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +∞% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +33900% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin DVitamin D | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +700% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +12475% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +10600% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +5700% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
0 g
Fats:
0 g
Carbs:
0.2 g
Water:
99.7 g
Other:
0.1 g
Protein:
20.05 g
Fats:
27.25 g
Carbs:
0.49 g
Water:
48.42 g
Other:
3.79 g
| Contains more WaterWater | +105.9% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +∞% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +∞% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +145% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +3690% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.002 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.001 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.005 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
16.746 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
8.606 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.495 g
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -100% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +860500% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +9800% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Saturated fat | 0.002g | 16.746g | 76% |
| Phosphorus | 0mg | 393mg | 56% |
| Calcium | 2mg | 497mg | 50% |
| Vitamin B12 | 0µg | 1.04µg | 43% |
| Fats | 0g | 27.25g | 42% |
| Protein | 0g | 20.05g | 40% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.004mg | 0.503mg | 38% |
| Vitamin A | 1µg | 340µg | 38% |
| Sodium | 1mg | 800mg | 35% |
| Cholesterol | 0mg | 90mg | 30% |
| Selenium | 0µg | 14.5µg | 26% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.011mg | 1.177mg | 23% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.001g | 8.606g | 22% |
| Zinc | 0.04mg | 2.1mg | 19% |
| Calories | 1kcal | 327kcal | 16% |
| Folate | 1µg | 58µg | 14% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0mg | 0.086mg | 7% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.01mg | 0.08mg | 6% |
| Magnesium | 1mg | 21mg | 5% |
| Potassium | 9mg | 128mg | 4% |
| Vitamin D | 0µg | 0.5µg | 3% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.005g | 0.495g | 3% |
| Vitamin D | 0IU | 20IU | 3% |
| Choline | 0mg | 15.4mg | 3% |
| Vitamin E | 0mg | 0.23mg | 2% |
| Vitamin K | 0µg | 2.3µg | 2% |
| Copper | 0.015mg | 0.021mg | 1% |
| Vitamin B3 | 0mg | 0.158mg | 1% |
| Iron | 0.08mg | 0.13mg | 1% |
| Net carbs | 0.2g | 0.49g | N/A |
| Carbs | 0.2g | 0.49g | 0% |
| Sugar | 0g | 0.49g | N/A |
| Manganese | 0.044mg | 0.038mg | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.289mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.739mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 1.219mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 2.093mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 1.675mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.619mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 1.116mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 1.439mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.578mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
0%
42%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
2%
60%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Roman chamomile is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 90mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Roman chamomile is lower in Sugar (difference - 0.49g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Roman chamomile contains less Sodium (difference - 799mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Roman chamomile is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 16.744g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Roman chamomile is lower in glycemic index (difference - 27)
Which food is cheaper?
Roman chamomile is cheaper (difference - $3)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Limburger is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Limburger is relatively richer in vitamins