Soba vs. Limburger — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
How are soba and Limburger different?
- Limburger has more phosphorus, calcium, vitamin B12, vitamin B2, vitamin A, vitamin B5, and zinc than soba.
- Daily need coverage for saturated fat for Limburger is 84% higher.
- Soba has less sodium.
- Limburger has a lower glycemic index (27) than soba (46).
Noodles, japanese, soba, cooked and Cheese, limburger are the varieties used in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more IronIron | +269.2% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -92.5% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +884.2% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +133.3% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +12325% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +265.7% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +162.5% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +1650% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +1472% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +17.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +222.8% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin DVitamin D | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +1834.6% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +400.9% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +115% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +728.6% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +4275.5% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +50.8% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +296.2% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +27150% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +871.8% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -99.9% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +33000% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +1496.8% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Saturated fat | 0.019g | 16.746g | 76% |
| Phosphorus | 25mg | 393mg | 53% |
| Calcium | 4mg | 497mg | 49% |
| Vitamin B12 | 0µg | 1.04µg | 43% |
| Fats | 0.1g | 27.25g | 42% |
| Vitamin A | 0µg | 340µg | 38% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.026mg | 0.503mg | 37% |
| Sodium | 60mg | 800mg | 32% |
| Cholesterol | 0mg | 90mg | 30% |
| Protein | 5.06g | 20.05g | 30% |
| Selenium | 14.5µg | 26% | |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.026g | 8.606g | 21% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.235mg | 1.177mg | 19% |
| Zinc | 0.12mg | 2.1mg | 18% |
| Manganese | 0.374mg | 0.038mg | 15% |
| Folate | 7µg | 58µg | 13% |
| Calories | 99kcal | 327kcal | 11% |
| Carbs | 21.44g | 0.49g | 7% |
| Iron | 0.48mg | 0.13mg | 4% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.04mg | 0.086mg | 4% |
| Choline | 15.4mg | 3% | |
| Vitamin D | 0µg | 0.5µg | 3% |
| Potassium | 35mg | 128mg | 3% |
| Magnesium | 9mg | 21mg | 3% |
| Vitamin D | 0IU | 20IU | 3% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.031g | 0.495g | 3% |
| Vitamin E | 0.23mg | 2% | |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.51mg | 0.158mg | 2% |
| Vitamin K | 2.3µg | 2% | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.094mg | 0.08mg | 1% |
| Copper | 0.008mg | 0.021mg | 1% |
| Net carbs | 21.44g | 0.49g | N/A |
| Sugar | 0.49g | N/A | |
| Tryptophan | 0.072mg | 0.289mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 0.177mg | 0.739mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 0.195mg | 1.219mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 0.33mg | 2.093mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 0.214mg | 1.675mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0.072mg | 0.619mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 0.217mg | 1.116mg | 0% |
| Valine | 0.249mg | 1.439mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0.119mg | 0.578mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
5%
42%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
10%
60%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Soba is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 90mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Soba is lower in Sugar (difference - 0.49g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Soba contains less Sodium (difference - 740mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Soba is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 16.727g)
Which food is cheaper?
Soba is cheaper (difference - $3)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Limburger is lower in glycemic index (difference - 19)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Limburger is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Limburger is relatively richer in vitamins