Succotash vs. Mars — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
What are the differences between succotash and mars?
- Succotash is higher in vitamin C, iron, and fiber, yet mars is higher in calcium.
- Mars's daily need coverage for saturated fat is 57% more.
- Succotash has 30 times more vitamin C than mars. While succotash has 15.1mg of vitamin C, mars has only 0.5mg.
- The amount of sodium in succotash is lower.
We used Succotash, (corn and limas), raw and Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, M&M's Crispy Chocolate Candies types in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +∞% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +∞% |
| Contains more IronIron | +112.8% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +∞% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +∞% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +∞% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -97.1% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +∞% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +∞% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +400% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +2920% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +17.5% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +4200% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +1794.1% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +269.6% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +82.5% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -98.4% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +∞% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +∞% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Saturated fat | 0.19g | 11.651g | 52% |
| Manganese | 0.688mg | 30% | |
| Fats | 1.02g | 19.32g | 28% |
| Copper | 0.186mg | 21% | |
| Calories | 99kcal | 475kcal | 19% |
| Carbs | 19.59g | 72.4g | 18% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.208mg | 17% | |
| Vitamin C | 15.1mg | 0.5mg | 16% |
| Phosphorus | 113mg | 16% | |
| Iron | 1.83mg | 0.86mg | 12% |
| Magnesium | 48mg | 11% | |
| Potassium | 369mg | 11% | |
| Vitamin B3 | 1.587mg | 10% | |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.13mg | 10% | |
| Folate | 40µg | 10% | |
| Calcium | 18mg | 90mg | 7% |
| Fiber | 3.8g | 2g | 7% |
| Zinc | 0.61mg | 6% | |
| Sodium | 4mg | 136mg | 6% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.082mg | 6% | |
| Cholesterol | 0mg | 12mg | 4% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.489g | 3% | |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.128mg | 3% | |
| Vitamin A | 15µg | 2% | |
| Protein | 5.03g | 4.28g | 2% |
| Selenium | 0.6µg | 1% | |
| Net carbs | 15.79g | 70.4g | N/A |
| Sugar | 58.94g | N/A | |
| Trans fat | 0g | 0.131g | N/A |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.198g | 0% | |
| Tryptophan | 0.056mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.209mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 0.284mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 0.443mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 0.295mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.068mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.243mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 0.306mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.16mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
17%
0%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
36%
8%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Succotash is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 12mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Succotash is lower in Sugar (difference - 58.94g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Succotash contains less Sodium (difference - 132mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Succotash is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 11.461g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Succotash is lower in glycemic index (difference - 62)
Which food is cheaper?
Succotash is cheaper (difference - $2)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Succotash is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Succotash is relatively richer in vitamins