Succotash vs. Sugar substitute — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
The main differences between succotash and sugar substitute
- Succotash is richer in manganese, iron, copper, vitamin B1, phosphorus, fiber, magnesium, and potassium, yet sugar substitute is richer in calcium.
- Daily need coverage for calcium for sugar substitute is 86% higher.
- Succotash contains 31 times more manganese than sugar substitute. Succotash contains 0.688mg of manganese, while sugar substitute contains 0.022mg.
- Succotash contains less sodium.
Food types used in this article are Succotash, (corn and limas), raw and Sweeteners, sugar substitute, granulated, brown.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +700% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +846.2% |
| Contains more IronIron | +1043.8% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +2557.1% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +1425% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +1312.5% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -99.3% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +3027.3% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +∞% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +4783.3% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +1286.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +446.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +60% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +766.7% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
5.03 g
Fats:
1.02 g
Carbs:
19.59 g
Water:
73.1 g
Other:
1.26 g
Protein:
2.06 g
Fats:
0 g
Carbs:
84.77 g
Water:
9.14 g
Other:
4.03 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +144.2% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +∞% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +699.8% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +332.7% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +219.8% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Calcium | 18mg | 879mg | 86% |
| Manganese | 0.688mg | 0.022mg | 29% |
| Sodium | 4mg | 572mg | 25% |
| Carbs | 19.59g | 84.77g | 22% |
| Iron | 1.83mg | 0.16mg | 21% |
| Copper | 0.186mg | 0.007mg | 20% |
| Vitamin C | 15.1mg | 17% | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.208mg | 0.015mg | 16% |
| Phosphorus | 113mg | 8mg | 15% |
| Fiber | 3.8g | 0.6g | 13% |
| Calories | 99kcal | 347kcal | 12% |
| Folate | 40µg | 10% | |
| Potassium | 369mg | 39mg | 10% |
| Magnesium | 48mg | 6mg | 10% |
| Vitamin B3 | 1.587mg | 10% | |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.13mg | 0.015mg | 9% |
| Protein | 5.03g | 2.06g | 6% |
| Zinc | 0.61mg | 0.04mg | 5% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.082mg | 0.015mg | 5% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.489g | 3% | |
| Vitamin A | 15µg | 2% | |
| Fats | 1.02g | 0g | 2% |
| Saturated fat | 0.19g | 1% | |
| Selenium | 0.6µg | 1% | |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.128mg | 0.08mg | 1% |
| Starch | 3.52g | 1% | |
| Net carbs | 15.79g | 84.17g | N/A |
| Sugar | 4.03g | N/A | |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.198g | 0% | |
| Tryptophan | 0.056mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.209mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 0.284mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 0.443mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 0.295mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.068mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.243mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 0.306mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.16mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
17%
1%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
36%
36%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Sugar substitute is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 0mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Sugar substitute is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 0.19g)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Succotash is lower in Sugar (difference - 4.03g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Succotash contains less Sodium (difference - 568mg)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Succotash is lower in glycemic index (difference - 40)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Succotash is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Succotash is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)