Foodstruct Nutrition Search | Diet Analysis | Food Comparison | Glycemic Index Chart | Insulin Index Chart | Blog | Subscribe | Sign Up

Sugar substitute vs. Beef tenderloin — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison

Compare

How are sugar substitute and beef tenderloin different?

  • Sugar substitute has more calcium; however, beef tenderloin is richer in iron, zinc, phosphorus, vitamin B2, vitamin B6, copper, potassium, and vitamin B1.
  • Sugar substitute covers your daily need for calcium, 87% more than beef tenderloin.
  • Sugar substitute has 10 times more sodium than beef tenderloin. Sugar substitute has 572mg of sodium, while beef tenderloin has 57mg.
  • Sugar substitute has a higher glycemic index. The glycemic index of sugar substitute is 40, while the glycemic index of beef tenderloin is 0.

Sweeteners, sugar substitute, granulated, brown and Beef, tenderloin, roast, separable lean, and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, all grades, cooked, roasted types were used in this article.

Infographic

Sugar substitute vs Beef tenderloin infographic
Infographic link

Mineral Comparison

Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 4.3% 264% 3.4% 6% 2.3% 1.1% 3.4% 75% 2.9% 0%
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 16% 2.7% 29% 117% 41% 110% 87% 7.4% 1.8% 125%
Contains more CalciumCalcium +9666.7%
Contains more ManganeseManganese +57.1%
Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium +266.7%
Contains more PotassiumPotassium +748.7%
Contains more IronIron +1843.8%
Contains more CopperCopper +1657.1%
Contains more ZincZinc +9975%
Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus +2437.5%
Contains less SodiumSodium -90%

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 0% 0% 0% 0% 3.8% 3.5% 0% 4.8% 3.5% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 0% 0% 0% 0% 23% 60% 56% 15% 58% 308% 0% 6% 50%
Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 +500%
Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 +1633.3%
Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 +212.5%
Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 +1566.7%
~equal in Vitamin C ~0mg
~equal in Vitamin A ~0µg
~equal in Vitamin E ~mg
~equal in Vitamin D ~µg
~equal in Vitamin K ~µg

All nutrients comparison - raw data values

Nutrient Sugar substitute Beef tenderloin DV% diff.
Vitamin B12 2.46µg 103%
Calcium 879mg 9mg 87%
Saturated fat 9.72g 44%
Protein 2.06g 23.9g 44%
Selenium 22.9µg 42%
Fats 0g 24.6g 38%
Iron 0.16mg 3.11mg 37%
Zinc 0.04mg 4.03mg 36%
Phosphorus 8mg 203mg 28%
Carbs 84.77g 0g 28%
Cholesterol 85mg 28%
Monounsaturated fat 10.27g 26%
Sodium 572mg 57mg 22%
Vitamin B3 3mg 19%
Vitamin B2 0.015mg 0.26mg 19%
Vitamin B6 0.015mg 0.25mg 18%
Choline 91mg 17%
Copper 0.007mg 0.123mg 13%
Potassium 39mg 331mg 9%
Polyunsaturated fat 1g 7%
Vitamin B1 0.015mg 0.09mg 6%
Magnesium 6mg 22mg 4%
Vitamin B5 0.08mg 0.25mg 3%
Folate 8µg 2%
Fiber 0.6g 0g 2%
Calories 347kcal 324kcal 1%
Starch 3.52g 1%
Net carbs 84.17g 0g N/A
Sugar 4.03g 0g N/A
Manganese 0.022mg 0.014mg 0%
Tryptophan 0.268mg 0%
Threonine 1.044mg 0%
Isoleucine 1.075mg 0%
Leucine 1.889mg 0%
Lysine 1.989mg 0%
Methionine 0.612mg 0%
Phenylalanine 0.933mg 0%
Valine 1.163mg 0%
Histidine 0.818mg 0%

Macronutrient Comparison

Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
2% 85% 9% 4%
Protein: 2.06 g
Fats: 0 g
Carbs: 84.77 g
Water: 9.14 g
Other: 4.03 g
24% 25% 48% 3%
Protein: 23.9 g
Fats: 24.6 g
Carbs: 0 g
Water: 48.37 g
Other: 3.13 g
Contains more CarbsCarbs +∞%
Contains more OtherOther +28.8%
Contains more ProteinProtein +1060.2%
Contains more FatsFats +∞%
Contains more WaterWater +429.2%

People also compare

References

All the values for which the sources are not specified explicitly are taken from FDA’s Food Central. The exact link to the food presented on this page can be found below.

  1. Sugar substitute - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/170675/nutrients
  2. Beef tenderloin - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/169544/nutrients

All the Daily Values are presented for males aged 31-50, for 2000-calorie diets.

Data provided by FoodStruct.com should be considered and used as information only. Please consult your physician before beginning any diet.