Table salt vs. Arborio rice — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Significant differences between table salt and arborio rice
- The amount of folate, iron, vitamin B1, selenium, manganese, vitamin B3, and vitamin B5 in arborio rice is higher than in table salt.
- Table salt covers your daily sodium needs 1685% more than arborio rice.
- Arborio rice has 24 times less calcium than table salt. Table salt has 24mg of calcium, while arborio rice has 1mg.
- Arborio rice contains less sodium.
- Arborio rice has a higher glycemic index. The glycemic index of arborio rice is 69, while the glycemic index of table salt is 0.
Specific food types used in this comparison are Salt, table and Rice, white, short-grain, enriched, cooked.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +2300% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +700% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +225% |
| Contains more IronIron | +342.4% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +140% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +300% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +∞% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -100% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +257% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +7400% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
0 g
Fats:
0 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
0.2 g
Other:
99.8 g
Protein:
2.36 g
Fats:
0.19 g
Carbs:
28.73 g
Water:
68.53 g
Other:
0.19 g
| Contains more OtherOther | +52426.3% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +∞% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +∞% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +34165% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Sodium | 38758mg | 0mg | 1685% |
| Folate | 0µg | 59µg | 15% |
| Iron | 0.33mg | 1.46mg | 14% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0mg | 0.164mg | 14% |
| Selenium | 0.1µg | 7.5µg | 13% |
| Manganese | 0.1mg | 0.357mg | 11% |
| Carbs | 0g | 28.73g | 10% |
| Vitamin B3 | 0mg | 1.493mg | 9% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0mg | 0.397mg | 8% |
| Calories | 0kcal | 130kcal | 7% |
| Phosphorus | 0mg | 33mg | 5% |
| Copper | 0.03mg | 0.072mg | 5% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0mg | 0.059mg | 5% |
| Protein | 0g | 2.36g | 5% |
| Zinc | 0.1mg | 0.4mg | 3% |
| Calcium | 24mg | 1mg | 2% |
| Magnesium | 1mg | 8mg | 2% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0mg | 0.016mg | 1% |
| Potassium | 8mg | 26mg | 1% |
| Fats | 0g | 0.19g | 0% |
| Net carbs | 0g | 28.73g | N/A |
| Saturated fat | 0g | 0.051g | 0% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0g | 0.058g | 0% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0g | 0.05g | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0mg | 0.027mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 0mg | 0.084mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 0mg | 0.102mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 0mg | 0.195mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 0mg | 0.085mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0mg | 0.056mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 0mg | 0.126mg | 0% |
| Valine | 0mg | 0.144mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0mg | 0.056mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
0%
12%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
510%
20%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Table salt is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 0.051g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Table salt is lower in glycemic index (difference - 69)
Which food is cheaper?
Table salt is cheaper (difference - $0.9)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Arborio rice is lower in Sugar (difference - 0g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Arborio rice contains less Sodium (difference - 38758mg)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Arborio rice is relatively richer in minerals
Which food contains less Cholesterol?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Cholesterol (0 mg)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.