Tamale vs. Limburger — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Differences between tamale and Limburger
- Tamale contains less calcium, phosphorus, vitamin B2, vitamin A, vitamin B12, vitamin B5, and selenium than Limburger.
- Limburger's daily need coverage for saturated fat is 72% higher.
- Limburger has a lower glycemic index. The glycemic index of Limburger is 27, while the glycemic index of tamale is 82.
The food types used in this comparison are Tamales (Navajo) and Cheese, limburger.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more IronIron | +838.5% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +200% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -46.6% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +357.9% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +1613.8% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +41.9% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +297% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +141.7% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +906.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +66.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +60% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +528.8% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +474.1% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +92.6% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +286.7% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +3598% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +40.6% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +219.3% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +345.3% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +174.6% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -85.7% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +39% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +214.2% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Rich in minerals | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Saturated fat | 2.396g | 16.746g | 65% |
| Calcium | 29mg | 497mg | 47% |
| Phosphorus | 99mg | 393mg | 42% |
| Vitamin A | 0µg | 340µg | 38% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.08mg | 0.503mg | 33% |
| Fats | 6.12g | 27.25g | 33% |
| Protein | 6.28g | 20.05g | 28% |
| Cholesterol | 17mg | 90mg | 24% |
| Vitamin B12 | 0.54µg | 1.04µg | 21% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.205mg | 1.177mg | 19% |
| Sodium | 427mg | 800mg | 16% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 2.739g | 8.606g | 15% |
| Selenium | 6µg | 14.5µg | 15% |
| Iron | 1.22mg | 0.13mg | 14% |
| Fiber | 3.1g | 0g | 12% |
| Folate | 15µg | 58µg | 11% |
| Vitamin B3 | 1.59mg | 0.158mg | 9% |
| Calories | 153kcal | 327kcal | 9% |
| Zinc | 1.48mg | 2.1mg | 6% |
| Carbs | 18.12g | 0.49g | 6% |
| Manganese | 0.174mg | 0.038mg | 6% |
| Starch | 12.27g | 5% | |
| Copper | 0.063mg | 0.021mg | 5% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.143mg | 0.086mg | 4% |
| Vitamin D | 20IU | 3% | |
| Choline | 15.4mg | 3% | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.05mg | 0.08mg | 3% |
| Vitamin D | 0.5µg | 3% | |
| Vitamin K | 2.3µg | 2% | |
| Vitamin E | 0mg | 0.23mg | 2% |
| Vitamin C | 1.7mg | 0mg | 2% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.688g | 0.495g | 1% |
| Net carbs | 15.02g | 0.49g | N/A |
| Magnesium | 22mg | 21mg | 0% |
| Potassium | 131mg | 128mg | 0% |
| Sugar | 0.99g | 0.49g | N/A |
| Tryptophan | 0.052mg | 0.289mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 0.239mg | 0.739mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 0.271mg | 1.219mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 0.568mg | 2.093mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 0.427mg | 1.675mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0.15mg | 0.619mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 0.275mg | 1.116mg | 0% |
| Valine | 0.318mg | 1.439mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0.196mg | 0.578mg | 0% |
| Fructose | 0.17g | 0% | |
| Omega-3 - ALA | 0.029g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
15%
42%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
30%
60%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Tamale is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 73mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Tamale contains less Sodium (difference - 373mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Tamale is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 14.35g)
Which food is cheaper?
Tamale is cheaper (difference - $3)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Limburger is lower in Sugar (difference - 0.5g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Limburger is lower in glycemic index (difference - 55)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Limburger is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is richer in minerals?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.